Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811260›Full record

ArticleGMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW2024

Free vascularized fibula transfer in single- or double-barrel technique for reconstruction of segmental bone defects following oncological resection or posttraumatic bone loss.

Kevin Bienger, Vlad Stefan, Adrian Dragu, Olimpiu Bota, Feras Taqatqeh, Klaus-Dieter Schaser, Michele Rudari, Hagen Fritzsche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin BiengerUniversity Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Germany.
Vlad StefanUniversity Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Germany.
Adrian DraguUniversity Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Germany.
Olimpiu BotaUniversity Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Germany.
Feras TaqatqehUniversity Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Germany.
Klaus-Dieter SchaserUniversity Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Germany.
Michele RudariUniversity Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Germany.
Hagen FritzscheUniversity Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Significant osseous defects or osteonecrosis, precipitated by open fractures, infections, or neoplastic conditions, represent infrequent yet critical medical conditions. The free vascularized fibular graft (FVFG) is a challenging but straightforward, reliable surgical intervention for the reconstruction of defects across various anatomical regions. This study aims to compare, quantify, and demonstrate the FVFG's versatility. The utilization of a single- or double-barrel approach, contingent on the defect's characteristics, optimizes length conservation or enhances the stability of extensive defects. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent the FVFG procedure, employing either a single- or double-barrel technique, at our medical center during the period from August 2017 to May 2023. The inclusion criterion was the presence of substantial osseous defects (bone loss in straight bone over 8-10 cm or multi-level spine resection), precipitated by trauma, neoplasms, non-union fractures or infections. Results: Our study encompassed eight male patients, with an average age of 31 years, ranging from 10 to 56. Each patient underwent osseous resection due to osteomyelitis (n=2), tumor excision (n=4), or pseudarthrosis (n=2) resulting from previous trauma, followed by a free fibula flap as part of the FVFG procedure. When fibula was simultaneously prepared already during tumor resection (n=2), there was a significant reduction in the overall operation time. Postoperative assessment revealed that full osseous integrity without any graft failure was restored in all patients, and the same number of patients regained independent ambulatory ability. Surgical complications were observed in one patient, who exhibited wound healing post-reconstruction, all of which were rectified through subsequent surgical intervention. Conclusion: Diverse osseous defects in complex cases can be reconstructed by using the FVFG, thereby restoring maximal reconstructive capacity, expedited union compared to non-vascularized bone, and acceptable donor site morbidity. FVFG remain a reliable solution for diverse defects. Moreover, in cases requiring complex tumor defects, careful preoperative planning and an interdisciplinary treatment are essential for successful treatment.

Indexed as

bone reconstructionbone tumorsfree vascularized fibular bone graftorthopaedic surgerysegmental bone defectsegmental bone loss

Identifiers

PMID39811260
PMCPMC11729700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.