ArticleJournal of pain research2025
The Association of Occipital Spur with Craniocervical Posture and Craniofacial Morphology.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Occipital spur: a common but underreported finding on lateral cephalograms-an observational study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the relationship between occipital spur (OS) with both craniocervical posture and craniofacial morphology. Methods: The study involved 240 lateral cephalograms from subjects with and without OS. The craniocervical posture and facial morphology of every individual were assessed through Uceph software analysis of their cephalograms, considering 32 variables. The Independent Results: Subjects with OS exhibited more severe forward head posture (FHP) (larger C0-C1, Ba-C3ia, C2ap-C4ip, craniocervical angle, CVT-OPT, and NSL-C2') and larger facial configuration (greater mandibular body length, posterior cranial base length, and posterior facial height) than the subjects without OS. Larger C2ap-C4ip (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.282~1.82), Craniocervical angle (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.457~1.977) and NSL-C2' (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.097~1.264), were associated with greater likelihood of having OS. Conclusion: The subjects with OS were more prone to forward head posture than the control group. For subjects observed with OS on cephalograms, attention should be given to their possible abnormal cervical and head postures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.