ArticleCureus2024
Comparison of Different Machine Learning Models for Predicting Long-Term Overall Survival in Non-metastatic Colorectal Cancers.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning and deep learning models for predicting colorectal cancer metastases: A comprehensive review.European journal of radiology open · 2026Review
- Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting cancer-specific survival in colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Can Vascular Vertigo Be Recognized by Artificial Intelligence Methods?Noro psikiyatri arsivi · 2026Article
- A Novel Method for Predicting Oncogenic Types of Human Papillomavirus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Deep Learning and Image Generator Health Tabular Data (IGHT) for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Retrospective Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Integrating inflammation, nutrition, and artificial intelligence: A new era in colorectal cancer prognostic scoring.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Advancing Colorectal Cancer Diagnostics from Barium Enema to AI-Assisted Colonoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prognostic value of routine blood biomarkers in 3-year survival of resectable colorectal cancer patients: a prognostic nomogram for clinical practice.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn recent years, machine learning (ML) methods have gained significant popularity among medical researchers interested in cancer. We aimed to test different (ML) models to predict both overall survival and survival at specific time points in patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).
methodsThe clinicopathological and treatment data of non-metastatic CRC patients with more than 10 years of follow-up at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10-year survival rates for all patients and stages I-III were statistically calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Five distinct machine-learning algorithms were employed to develop predictive models for patient survival at five designated time points.
resultsA total of 498 patients were included in the study. The decision tree model had the highest area under the curve (AUC) for 1-year survival prediction (0.89). The ensemble model had the highest AUC for predicting 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival predictions (0.86, 0.92, and 0.89, respectively), while the support vector machine model had the highest AUC (0.84) for predicting 10-year survival. When considering the stages separately and assessing survival for the designated time intervals, the accuracy of all five models was found to be similar, ranging around 70% or higher.
conclusionML models can predict short- and long-term survival in patients with CRC, both for the overall patient population and when stratified by stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.