SynthesisThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2024
The Efficacy of Prophylactic Vancomycin in Decreasing Surgical Site Infections in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: A Large Multicenter Cohort Study.
Synthesis in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Local vancomycin powder reduces surgical site infections and costs in spine surgery: a retrospective cohort study in a public hospital in Santiago, Chile.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of vancomycin powder in spine surgery has been supported in adult populations, however, its efficacy in preventing postoperative surgical site infections in AIS patients is yet to be determined. Methods: A multi-center review was conducted from June 2010 to February 2019, using ICD and CPT codes to identify AIS patients who underwent primary PSF. The patients were divided into two groups: the vancomycin cohort (receiving local vancomycin powder prior to wound closure) and the non-vancomycin cohort. Demographic and surgical data, microbial data, and SSI rates were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 1,917 AIS patients underwent PSF during the study period. There were no significant differences in age at surgery, BMI, sex, or presence of osteotomy between the two groups. The vancomycin cohort had 65.3% patients (n=1,252) with 0.5% (n=6) diagnosed SSIs, while the non-vancomycin cohort had 34.7% patients (n=665) with 0.8% (n=5) SSIs (p=0.451). Four (66.7%) gram-negative bacteria were isolated in the vancomycin cohort, compared to one (20%) in the non-vancomycin cohort. Conclusion: The results showed no significant reduction in surgical site infections with the use of prophylactic, local vancomycin in AIS patients undergoing PSF (0.5% versus 0.8%). Further studies are needed to fully assess the effectiveness of vancomycin in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39811169PMC11726485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.