ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2024
Trends in Research Productivity Among Residents Applying For United States Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Fellowships.
Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Research Productivity Trends Among Orthopaedic Adult Reconstruction Fellowship Applicants: A Bibliometric Study.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Success in the Sports Medicine Fellowship Match: The Role of Research Productivity and Academic Metrics.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Research Output of Adult Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Fellowship Matriculants: A National Cross-Sectional Analysis.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Little empirical research has been done on factors evaluated in the fellowship matching process, this study intends to evaluate the impact of research productivity. Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify research trends and characterize the academic profiles of recent Foot and Ankle (F&A) fellows in the United States when they applied for fellowship. Methods: The American Orthopedic F&A Society website was used to identify accepted fellows between the years 2017-2023. A retrospective bibliometric analysis was performed using the total number of publications up to December 31st of the year prior to the start of fellowship, collected from each fellow's Scopus profiles. Recorded data included total number of publications, citations, authorship position, and publications with a F&A focus. Data was compared between academic versus community fellowship programs, and by years, fellowship and residency program region, medical degree, and sex. Results: A total of 444 F&A fellows from 2017 to 2023 were identified, and 404 (90.99%) were verified. Fellows averaged 5.288±10.075 publications and 60.646±232.297 citations. Fellows were listed as first author in 31.35% publications and middle author in 65.08% publications, while 93.81% of fellows had at least 1 publication, and 54.95% percent had at least 1 first author publication (Table 1). A statistically significant increase in average number of publications was identified between the years 2017 and 2018 and the years 2020-2023 (Table 2). Conclusion: There exists a statistically significant, increasing trend in research productivity of F&A fellows across the years 2017-2023. Over half of fellows published at least one first authorship article, and just under half had a publication focused on F&A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39811166PMC11726478What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.