ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2024
Coronal Malalignment Is Infrequently Present in Patients With Aseptic Tibial Loosening.
Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronal lower extremity malalignment and improper implant position have been described as risk factors for aseptic tibial loosening following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, several prior studies have shown no association between alignment and implant loosening. Meanwhile, there is increasing interest in kinematic alignment. Therefore, we sought to determine the incidence of coronal malalignment of the limb and tibial component in patients that were revised secondary to aseptic tibial loosening. Methods: A cohort of 73 patients that were revised for aseptic tibial loosening was identified. Patient demographics were recorded. Radiographs from the primary procedure (preoperative and postoperative) were reviewed to determine the index coronal alignment of the knee and tibial component. Adequate alignment was noted if limb alignment was in neutral or appropriate valgus alignment and tibial implant position was within 3° of the neutral mechanical axis. Results: Four (5.5%) patients had varus alignment of the tibial component >3°. Therefore, 69/73 (94.5%) patients had well-aligned tibial implants. The average coronal alignment of the limb was 3° of valgus and six (8.2%) patients had coronal varus limb alignment (all >0° anatomic varus). Conclusion: Limb and tibial implant malalignment were infrequently seen in patients revised secondary to aseptic tibial loosening. Most patients fell within previously described "safe" alignment parameters (<3° varus for the tibial component and neutral or valgus limb alignment). Specifically, malalignment was only present in approximately six to eight percent of patients. Therefore, factors other than alignment appear to contribute most to the development of aseptic tibial loosening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39811165PMC11726476What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.