ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2024
Did the Covid-19 Pandemic Impact Time to Surgery, Length of Hospital Stay, or Discharge Location for Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures Requiring Surgical Intervention?
Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare systems across the United States resources were consumed caring for COVID-19 patients. Past research on trauma activations during COVID-19 has found changes to hospital length of stay and discharge locations. Subaxial spine fractures are potentially debilitating injuries that require timely surgery and extensive rehabilitation. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to compare the severity of cervical spine injuries, time to surgery, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition for patients presenting during COVID-19. Methods: 128 patients with subaxial fractures from a Level One Adult Trauma Center that required surgical intervention were reviewed. The primary outcomes included hospital length of stay, ICU days, time to surgery, complications, and discharge location in patients with subaxial cervical fractures during COVID-19 pandemic versus immediately before the pandemic. Results: When comparing the pre-COVID-19 period to the COVID-19 group, there was no difference in time to surgery or overall length of stay (2.47 vs. 2.35 days and 12.93 vs. 13.82 days, p>0.05). There was no difference in number of patients discharged home during COVID-19 (41% (32/79) vs. 37% (18/49) p>0.05) or patients discharged to hospital rehab (33%, (26/79) vs. 35% (17/49), p>0.05). A similar percentage of patients had complications within 90 days of discharge (16% (12/75) vs. 22% (10/46), p>0.05). Conclusion: Despite the burden COVID-19 placed on healthcare systems, it did not affect post-operative hospital course of subaxial fracture patients with potentially debilitating injuries. This vulnerable subset of patients presenting during COVID-19 was still able to undergo timely surgery, have an appropriate hospital length of stay, and be discharged to rehabilitation centers. In future stresses to the healthcare system, deferring elective and non-emergent procedures can allow proper care for emergencies such as subaxial fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39811159PMC11726475What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.