Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811088›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025

Bayesian fractional polynomial approach to quantile regression and variable selection with application in the analysis of blood pressure among US adults.

Sanna Soomro, Keming Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanna SoomroDepartment of Mathematics, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Keming YuDepartment of Mathematics, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the fractional polynomials (FPs) can act as a concise and accurate formula for examining smooth relationships between response and predictors, modelling conditional mean functions observes the partial view of a distribution of response variable, as distributions of many response variables such as blood pressure (BP) measures are typically skew. Conditional quantile functions with FPs provide a comprehensive relationship between the response variable and its predictors, such as median and extremely high-BP measures that may be often required in practical data analysis generally. To the best of our knowledge, this is new in the literature. Therefore, in this article, we develop and employ Bayesian variable selection with quantile-dependent prior for the FP model to propose a Bayesian variable selection with parametric non-linear quantile regression model. The objective is to examine a non-linear relationship between BP measures and their risk factors across median and upper quantile levels using data extracted from the 2007 to 2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The variable selection in the model analysis identified that the non-linear terms of continuous variables (body mass index, age), and categorical variables (ethnicity, gender, and marital status) were selected as important predictors in the model across all quantile levels.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferencefractional polynomialsnon-linear quantile regressionparametric regressionquantile regressionvariable selection

Identifiers

PMID39811088
PMCPMC11727065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.