Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811081›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025

Non-proportional hazards model with a PVF frailty term: application with a melanoma dataset.

Karen C Rosa, Vinicius F Calsavara, Francisco Louzada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karen C RosaInstitute of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vinicius F CalsavaraDepartment of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2332-5863
Francisco LouzadaInstitute of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7815-9554

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival data analysis often uses the Cox proportional hazards (PH) model. This model is widely applied due to its straightforward interpretation of the hazard ratio under the assumption that the hazard rates for two subjects remain constant over time. However, in several randomized clinical trials with long-term survival data comparing two new treatments, it is frequently observed that Kaplan-Meier plots exhibit crossing survival curves. This violation of the PH assumption of the Cox PH model can not be applied to evaluate the treatment's effect on survival. This paper introduces a novel long-term survival model with non-PH that incorporates a frailty term into the hazard function. This model allows us to examine the effect of prognostic factors on survival and quantify the degree of unobservable heterogeneity. The model parameters are estimated using the maximum likelihood estimation procedure, and we evaluate the performance of the proposed models through simulation studies. Additionally, we demonstrate the applicability of our approach by fitting the models to a real skin cancer dataset.

Indexed as

62N0262N03Cure rate modelsgeneralized time-dependent log-log modelmaximum likelihood estimationrandom effectsskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID39811081
PMCPMC11727191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.