Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811078›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025

Effects of community action on animal vaccination uptake, antimicrobial usage, and farmers' wellbeing in Ghana: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Francis Sena Nuvey, Günther Fink, Jan Hattendorf, Daniel T Haydon, Gilbert Fokou, Kennedy Kwasi Addo, Jakob Zinsstag, Clemence Esse-Dibby, Bassirou Bonfoh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francis Sena NuveyFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Südufer 10, 17493 Greifswald, Germany.
Günther FinkSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland.
Jan HattendorfSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland.
Daniel T HaydonSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ Glasgow, UK.
Gilbert FokouCentre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d'Ivoire, Abidjan BP 1303, Côte d'Ivoire.
Kennedy Kwasi AddoDepartment of Bacteriology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, P.O. Box LG 581, Ghana.
Jakob ZinsstagSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland.
Clemence Esse-DibbyCentre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d'Ivoire, Abidjan BP 1303, Côte d'Ivoire.
Bassirou BonfohCentre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d'Ivoire, Abidjan BP 1303, Côte d'Ivoire.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious animal diseases represent a major constraint to livestock productivity, food security and wellbeing in many developing countries. To mitigate these impacts, farmers frequently use antimicrobials without professional advice, potentially yielding drug residues in livestock products and the food chain, as well as resistant antimicrobial genes. Recent studies identified Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia (CBPP) and Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) as the diseases most negatively affecting ruminant livestock productivity and farmers' wellbeing in Ghana. Despite the approval and availability of effective CBPP and PPR vaccines in Ghana, acceptability, affordability, accessibility, and availability of vaccination limit their uptake, with only 15% of farmers regularly vaccinating their herds. During formative qualitative research to identify barriers and potential intervention options, farmers suggested that establishing localized farmer intervention platforms could improve vaccine access. The main idea is the platforms enabling information exchange on livestock vaccines, enhancing service scheduling, and sharing vaccination costs among farmers living in the same locality. We now wish to test formally this hypothesis. Through a cluster-randomized controlled trial, we aim to determine the effect of localized farmer platforms on animal vaccination uptake (primary outcome), antimicrobials use in livestock production, disease-induced mortality in livestock, and livestock farmers' wellbeing (secondary outcomes). The intervention will be randomized at the community level. The study will involve 460 farming households across 46 rural communities (study clusters). Clusters will be randomized with equal probability to treatment and control (23 communities each). Approximately 10 households per community will be sampled for data collection at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months post-intervention, following prevailing vaccination schedules. We will conduct an intention-to-treat analysis using the available case population. The findings will inform strategies to tackle the impact of infectious livestock diseases on food security, public health and farmers' wellbeing.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial useInfectious livestock diseasesOne HealthTransdisciplinaryVaccinationWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID39811078
PMCPMC11732147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.