Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811072›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

Medicaid billing for community health worker services growing, but remains low, 2016-2020.

Clese Erikson, Hong-Lun Tiunn, Jordan Herring, Eric Luo, Patricia Pittman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Integrating Community Health Workers Into Clinical Settings.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clese EriksonThe Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, Department of Health Policy and Management, The Milken Institute for Public Health, The George Washington University, 2175K Street, NW, Suite 250, Washington, DC 20037, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1531-9535
Hong-Lun TiunnThe Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, Department of Health Policy and Management, The Milken Institute for Public Health, The George Washington University, 2175K Street, NW, Suite 250, Washington, DC 20037, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5932-0901
Jordan HerringThe Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, Department of Health Policy and Management, The Milken Institute for Public Health, The George Washington University, 2175K Street, NW, Suite 250, Washington, DC 20037, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9625-1995
Eric LuoThe Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, Department of Health Policy and Management, The Milken Institute for Public Health, The George Washington University, 2175K Street, NW, Suite 250, Washington, DC 20037, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3413-9727
Patricia PittmanThe Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, Department of Health Policy and Management, The Milken Institute for Public Health, The George Washington University, 2175K Street, NW, Suite 250, Washington, DC 20037, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2794-6528

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the recognized value of Community Health Workers (CHWs) in improving health outcomes, the integration of CHWs into Medicaid continues to be a challenge. This study examines the trends in CHW billing for Medicaid services across states from 2016 to 2020. We conducted an exploratory descriptive analysis of the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) Analytic Files (TAF) 2016-2020 to identify trends in direct billing for CHW services, including beneficiaries served, total services rendered, payment type, place of service, and procedure codes used for services billed by CHWs. The number of CHWs billing Medicaid increased by 638% between 2016 and 2020. However, by 2020, there were still only 731 CHWs billing Medicaid in the 9 states examined with one state (Ohio) accounting for 77.7% of all Medicaid beneficiaries identified with CHW direct billing. The total number of CHW services grew nearly 23-fold, with 37.7% overall provided in patient homes. Significant billing inconsistencies were observed, including the use of non-designated procedure codes. Overall CHW billing in Medicaid remained low as of 2020, with the exception of Ohio. Understanding factors associated with Ohio's expansion could yield important insights for current efforts to improve access to CHWs for Medicaid beneficiaries.

Indexed as

community health workers (CHWs)healthcare billing trendshealth workforcemedicaid reimbursement

Identifiers

PMID39811072
PMCPMC11726829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.