Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811067›Full record

ReviewRegenerative therapy2025

Standardizing decellularization protocols for optimized uterine tissue bioengineering.

Edina Sehic, Lucía de Miguel-Gómez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Optimization and Standardization of Plant-Derived Vascular Scaffolds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edina SehicDepartment of Medical Cell Biology, Uppsala University, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden.
Lucía de Miguel-GómezLaboratory for Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Kvinnokliniken, Blå stråket 6, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioengineering is applied in different areas, including women's infertility management. Among other approaches, decellularized tissues are being used to treat uterine disorders causing infertility. Biomaterials made from decellularized tissue consist of tissue-specific extracellular matrix and, as acellular scaffolds, are thought to be immune inert. Hence, they are good grafting candidates to replace and regenerate excised damaged uterine tissue to cure infertility. However, decellularization approaches differ among species and research groups, posing challenges for comparison and standardization. The diversity in data reporting and studied properties of the resulting decellularized scaffold make it even more difficult, especially when the ultimate goal is clinical translation. Thus, this review aims to critically assess whole uterus decellularization studies, extracting and comparing their main results and conclusions. After carefully evaluating the reviewed studies, we noticed that the vast majority base the uterus decellularization success and resulting scaffold efficacy on the DNA removal efficacy, while other crucial aspects, including the extracellular matrix integrity or immunogenicity, are underestimated. Thus, this review further proposes practical points for what should be considered and how results can be reported in studies involving whole uterus decellularization to facilitate comparison between studies and translational progress.

Indexed as

BioengineeringDecellularizationScaffoldUterus

Identifiers

PMID39811067
PMCPMC11731971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.