ReviewRegenerative therapy2025
Standardizing decellularization protocols for optimized uterine tissue bioengineering.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunomodulatory role of decellularized extracellular matrix in skin wound healing.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Extracellular-Matrix-Based Materials from Decellularized Tissue: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions in Regenerative Medicine.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Porous Decellularized Nerve Grafts Facilitate Recellularization and Nerve Regeneration in a Rat Model of Critical Long-Gap Peripheral Nerve Injury.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Optimization and Standardization of Plant-Derived Vascular Scaffolds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioengineering is applied in different areas, including women's infertility management. Among other approaches, decellularized tissues are being used to treat uterine disorders causing infertility. Biomaterials made from decellularized tissue consist of tissue-specific extracellular matrix and, as acellular scaffolds, are thought to be immune inert. Hence, they are good grafting candidates to replace and regenerate excised damaged uterine tissue to cure infertility. However, decellularization approaches differ among species and research groups, posing challenges for comparison and standardization. The diversity in data reporting and studied properties of the resulting decellularized scaffold make it even more difficult, especially when the ultimate goal is clinical translation. Thus, this review aims to critically assess whole uterus decellularization studies, extracting and comparing their main results and conclusions. After carefully evaluating the reviewed studies, we noticed that the vast majority base the uterus decellularization success and resulting scaffold efficacy on the DNA removal efficacy, while other crucial aspects, including the extracellular matrix integrity or immunogenicity, are underestimated. Thus, this review further proposes practical points for what should be considered and how results can be reported in studies involving whole uterus decellularization to facilitate comparison between studies and translational progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.