Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810990›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Changes in life satisfaction, self-esteem, and self-rated health before, during, and after becoming a young carer in the UK: a longitudinal, propensity score analysis.

Rebecca E Lacey, Alejandra Letelier, Baowen Xue, Anne McMunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca E LaceySchool of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
Alejandra LetelierSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
Baowen XueResearch Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Anne McMunnResearch Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The health of young carers is poorer, on average, than their peers. The timing and persistence of health and wellbeing changes around becoming a young carer are unknown. We investigated how health and wellbeing change before, during and after becoming a young carer in the UK and whether this varies by caring intensity, age, gender, ethnicity, or household income. Methods: We used data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (2009-2023) on young people aged 10-25. Outcomes were self-rated health, life satisfaction and self-esteem (8-item Rosenberg scale). We used propensity score matching to match young carers to similar non-carers and applied piecewise growth curve modelling to model health and wellbeing trajectories for young carers and non-carers. Analyses were stratified by caring intensity (hours and recipient), age, gender, household income and ethnicity. Samples varied from 2320 (self-esteem by age-group) to 4606 (self-rated health by household income). Findings: Approximately 12% (n = 2400/16,622) of young people became young carers. Young carers had lower life satisfaction two years prior to becoming a young carer (-0.03, 95% confidence interval: -0.09, -0.01) and this difference persisted for three years after. Young carers who cared for 10 or more hours/week (-0.03, 95% confidence interval: -0.10, 0.04), those from Black ethnic groups (-0.22, 95% confidence interval: -0.38, -0.05), and those from households in the lowest fifth of income had larger differences in life satisfaction before and during becoming a young carer (-0.05, 95% confidence interval: -0.13, 0.04). We observed no differences in self-esteem or self-rated health during or after becoming a young carer. Interpretation: These findings highlight the importance of early identification and support for young carers plus reducing the care loads of young carers to prevent declines in wellbeing. Funding: The project has been funded by the Nuffield Foundation and the Joint Programming Initiative More Years Better Lives from the national funding body UK Economic and Social Research Council.

Indexed as

Life courseLife satisfactionLongitudinalSelf-esteemSelf-rated healthTransitionsUnpaid caringWellbeingYoung carer

Identifiers

PMID39810990
PMCPMC11726805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.