Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810972›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2025

Determining Filipinos' Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests: Insights From a Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis.

Austin Crochetiere, Marie Lauzon, Antwon Chaplin, Christopher V Almario

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Austin CrochetiereDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Marie LauzonBiostatistics Shared Resource, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, California.
Antwon ChaplinCedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California.
Christopher V AlmarioDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

Automated Colorectal Cancer Educational Support System (ACCESS): Development and Validation of a Novel Online Decision Aid for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening UptakeK08CA245033 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI ALMARIO, CHRISTOPHER V · 2020 to 2024
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA245033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Filipinos in the U.S. have worse colorectal cancer screening rates and outcomes than non-Hispanic Whites, despite 85% of Filipinos being proficient in English and having insurance rates, education, and incomes that exceed those of the general population. To begin to address this disparity, the authors used conjoint analysis-a method that assesses complex decision making-to better understand Filipinos' preferences for the different colorectal cancer screening test options. Methods: The authors conducted a conjoint analysis survey among unscreened Filipinos aged ≥40 years at average risk for colorectal cancer to determine the relative importance of screening test attributes in their decision making (e.g., modality, effectiveness at reducing colorectal cancer risk, bowel prep). The authors also performed simulations to estimate the proportion of people who would prefer to do an annual fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy every 10 years for their screening. Results: Overall, 105 Filipinos completed the survey; most respondents were female (74.3%) and aged 40-49 years (84.8%). The authors observed that test modality was the most important factor in respondents' decision making. After conducting simulations using the conjoint analysis data, the authors noted that 70 (66.7%) Filipinos preferred to do an annual fecal immunochemical test for their screening, whereas 35 (33.3%) wanted to do a colonoscopy every 10 years. Conclusions: The authors found that 2 in 3 Filipinos prefer fecal immunochemical test to colonoscopy for their colorectal cancer screening. To address colorectal cancer disparities in the Filipino community, investigators, health systems, public health agencies, and community organizations need to develop culturally tailored, sustainable interventions, and such programs may want to focus on improving education on and access to fecal immunochemical test.

Indexed as

colorectal cancer screeningdisparitiesFilipinopatient preference

Identifiers

PMID39810972
PMCPMC11731454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.