ArticleHealth science reports2025
Risk Factors and Patterns of Drug-Drug Interactions in Two Categories of Level-3 Hospitals in Dhaka: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug Safety in Hospitalized Diabetes Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Predictors and Clinical Relevance of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improving medication safety and efficiency in hospital pharmacy through a pharmacist-led, low-code mobile application: a prospective study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are a significant health issue that may adversely affect the health and well-being of patients. This study assesses and compares potential DDI (pDDI) patterns, severity, and associated risk factors in government and private hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Methods: A total of 188 and 206 prescriptions were collected from various government and private hospitals' outdoor departments, respectively, by capturing pictures of the prescriptions. Bivariate analyses were performed through STATA 15. MedScape drug interaction checker was applied to identify pDDIs, while their consequences were obtained from DrugBank and MedScape. Results: Private hospitals had more pDDIs containing prescriptions than government hospitals (62.62% and 57.97%, respectively). The mean pDDIs cases were 3.29 in the private hospitals, while at government hospitals they were 3.02. Among the detected pDDIs, pharmacodynamic pDDIs were predominat, accounting for 63.32% and 66.23% of total events in government and private hospitals, respectively. Severity-wise, both types of hospitals had almost equal amounts of serious (10.34% vs. 9.18%), moderate (68.96% vs. 59.61%), and minor (20.06% vs. 21.79%) pDDIs. Polypharmacy was crucial in pDDI cases, responsible for 70.21% and 81.83% of pDDIs in government and private hospitals, respectively. Multiple comorbidities with pDDIs were more common in private hospitals (24.46% vs. 18.93%), while government hospitals displayed a higher frequency of pDDIs with one comorbidity (24.75% vs. 17.55%). Non-mention of comorbidities was correlated with both types of hospitals ( Conclusion: The two kinds of hospitals exhibited similar pDDI patterns, while their associations were random with the risk variables. When prescribing pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics pDDIs, physicians should evaluate the risk-benefit ratio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.