Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810888›Full record

ArticleEJIFCC2024

Adolopment of Recommendations for Standardized Reporting of Protein Electrophoresis in Pakistan.

Sibtain Ahmed, Ayra Siddiqui, Aysha Habib Khan, Lena Jafri, Hafsa Majid, Ghazanfar Abbas, Alina Abdul Rehman, Muhammad D Khan, Muhammad Q A Khan, Sahar Iqbal and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJIFCC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sibtain AhmedSection of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Ayra SiddiquiMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aysha Habib KhanSection of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Lena JafriSection of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Hafsa MajidSection of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Ghazanfar AbbasDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Alina Abdul RehmanCenter for Clinical Best Practices (CCBP), Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad D KhanDepartments of Chemical Pathology, Chughtai Healthcare, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Q A KhanDepartment of Chemical Pathology and Endocrinology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Sahar IqbalDepartment of Pathology, Dow International Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Samia KhanSection of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Rizwana KausarSection of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Imran SiddiquiSection of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The standardization of reporting in clinical laboratories, particularly regarding Serum Protein Electrophoresis (SPEP) and Urine Protein Electrophoresis (UPEP), is crucial for effective communication of findings to clinicians and optimal patient management. However, in countries like Pakistan with limited healthcare resources and a prevalent self-payment model, challenges arise in achieving standardized reporting practices. This manuscript addresses the need for standardized guidelines for protein electrophoresis reporting in Pakistan, aiming to enhance laboratory practices and patient care. Methods: This study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Pakistan. A team consisting of five Consultant Chemical Pathologists and two senior technologists, led by the Section Head of Chemical Pathology at AKU, used a Modified Delphi Methodology to achieve consensus on the developed framework. Consensus was defined as agreement by at least six out of the seven experts (85.71%). The source guideline for this process was the Recommendations for Standardized Reporting of Protein Electrophoresis from Australia and New Zealand. Results: Consultant Chemical Pathologists reviewed the original and modified recommendations, resulting in a framework of ten sub-sections and 65 recommendations. Through a series of four meetings, including a diverse team of experts, the recommendations were systematically critiqued and reviewed. After detailed deliberations, 54 recommendations were finalized by consensus. The final document was further reviewed by CCBP staff and additional consultants from different institutions in Pakistan to ensure unbiased and comprehensive expert input. Discussion: The developed guidelines offer a framework for consistent and comprehensive reporting of PEP results, addressing variations in practices among clinical laboratories in Pakistan. Key modifications to the recommendations reflect a pragmatic approach to navigating resource constraints, ensuring that laboratory reports remain informative and actionable for clinicians. By prioritizing clinical relevance and practicality, the guidelines aim to enhance diagnostic accuracy and facilitate appropriate clinical management decisions. Conclusion: The standardized reporting guidelines for SPEP and UPEP represent a significant milestone in optimizing laboratory practices and improving patient care in Pakistan. Moving forward, continued monitoring and adaptation of the guidelines will be essential to ensure their sustained relevance and effectiveness in meeting the evolving needs of the healthcare system. Embracing a commitment to excellence in laboratory practices holds promise for advancing healthcare quality and accessibility in low-resource settings globally.

Indexed as

guidelinesPakistanProtein Electrophoresisreporting

Identifiers

PMID39810888
PMCPMC11726325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.