Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810828›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2025

Allergen immunotherapy in Italy: How, when, and why-A real-world study conducted through a patient association.

Giovanni Paoletti, Emanuele Nappi, Maria Chiara Bragato, Paola Valli, Mattia Giovannini, Domenico Gargano, Luca Pecoraro, Deborah Diso, Simona Barbaglia, Giorgio Walter Canonica and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Giovanni PaolettiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.
Emanuele NappiPersonalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Maria Chiara BragatoPersonalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Paola ValliPersonalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Mattia GiovanniniAllergy Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
Domenico GarganoAllergy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino, Italy.
Luca PecoraroPediatric Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Deborah DisoAssociazione Nazionale Pazienti Respiriamo Insieme-APS, Padua, Italy.
Simona BarbagliaAssociazione Nazionale Pazienti Respiriamo Insieme-APS, Padua, Italy.
Giorgio Walter CanonicaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.
Enrico HefflerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only treatment that modifies the natural course of allergies. However, AIT is only used in some eligible patients, is frequently underused, and only a few studies investigated this aspects. Understanding AIT utilization patterns might disclose information about why it is underused, thus providing valuable insights on how to broaden the positive impact it can have on the population. Methods: A questionnaire aiming to assess the trends of the use of AIT in Italy, patient health literacy on AIT, and the impact of respiratory allergies and AIT on patients' lives was submitted to patients affiliated with Respiriamo Insieme APS patient's association during the period between May and October 2023. Results: Nine hundred forty-four patients completed the questionnaire. Most patients reported to be affected by allergic rhinitis (81.1%), allergic asthma (45.4%), and/or allergic conjunctivitis (41.2%), and many of them presenting a combination of these diseases. Only 53.8% knew about AIT's existence, and AIT was proposed to only 33.1% of the 858 patients affected by allergic rhinitis and/or allergic asthma, of which 29.2% decided not to initiate the therapy. Common reasons for AIT refusal were related to indecisiveness (26.5%), costs (22.9%), and skepticism (19.3%). Among the remaining 70.8% who accepted to start AIT, 21.4% discontinued the treatment beforehand, on average 18.26 months from initiation. There was a high heterogeneity in the suggested duration of AIT, with 20.4% of patients receiving indications to continue AIT for less than 3 years. AIT positively impacted patients' lives as most patients who completed AIT found it effective and safe, and experienced a significant reduction in the workdays/schooldays lost due to disease exacerbations. Conclusions: The outcomes of this research pointed out a lot of misinformation surrounding AIT, calling for improvements in awareness and information on its efficacy and safety. Also, we noted a significant reduction in work/school days lost in patients who completed AIT and a good patient-reported safety and efficacy profile. We advocate for better economic accessibility through national-level standardization in treatment refundability. Notably, the collaboration with the patient association was crucial, and it would have been challenging to conduct this research otherwise.

Indexed as

Allergen immunotherapyAllergic rhinitisAsthmaCostsEffectiveness

Identifiers

PMID39810828
PMCPMC11732536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.