ReviewKidney international reports2025
Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With ESRD and Kidney Transplantation.
Review in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Anticoagulation approaches in hemodialysis: a systematic review of efficacy, safety, and literature gap.International urology and nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- A Survey on Anticoagulation Practices in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in Saudi Arabia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Prolongation of prothrombin time-international normalized ratio by concomitant use of warfarin and combination therapy with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in a patient with renal cell carcinoma on dialysis: a case report.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
- Scoping review of apixaban and rivaroxaban dosing for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism in advanced chronic kidney disease.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Electrocardiography to Predict Incident Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients.Kidney360 · 2026Article
- A multicenter prospective real-world cohort study of direct oral anticoagulant use for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in nephrotic syndrome.BMC nephrology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has significantly increased because major medical organizations endorse their role for conditions in which anticoagulation is indicated. Owing to important pharmacokinetic properties, the use of apixaban and rivaroxaban requires careful consideration in at-risk populations such as those with kidney disease. Both apixaban and rivaroxaban undergo some degree of renal elimination, and thus total drug exposure is increased in patients with renal insufficiency and/or those undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT). The available clinical trial and real-world data in this population suggests that apixaban is likely at least comparably effective as warfarin at preventing thromboembolic events and is likely safer when evaluating bleeding risk. Rivaroxaban data is more limited, and the reported results are more discordant. Both apixaban and rivaroxaban have been used successfully in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing kidney transplant listing as well as in the posttransplant setting. Prospective clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of apixaban and rivaroxaban in various conditions where anticoagulation is indicated should include patients with ESRD and kidney transplant recipients to help further define the role that these important novel agents should play in these complex patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.