Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810765›Full record

ReviewKidney international reports2025

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With ESRD and Kidney Transplantation.

Nicholas W Lange, Justin Muir, David M Salerno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas W LangeDepartment of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, USA.
Justin MuirDepartment of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, USA.
David M SalernoDepartment of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has significantly increased because major medical organizations endorse their role for conditions in which anticoagulation is indicated. Owing to important pharmacokinetic properties, the use of apixaban and rivaroxaban requires careful consideration in at-risk populations such as those with kidney disease. Both apixaban and rivaroxaban undergo some degree of renal elimination, and thus total drug exposure is increased in patients with renal insufficiency and/or those undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT). The available clinical trial and real-world data in this population suggests that apixaban is likely at least comparably effective as warfarin at preventing thromboembolic events and is likely safer when evaluating bleeding risk. Rivaroxaban data is more limited, and the reported results are more discordant. Both apixaban and rivaroxaban have been used successfully in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing kidney transplant listing as well as in the posttransplant setting. Prospective clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of apixaban and rivaroxaban in various conditions where anticoagulation is indicated should include patients with ESRD and kidney transplant recipients to help further define the role that these important novel agents should play in these complex patient populations.

Indexed as

apixabanend-stage renal diseaserivaroxaban

Identifiers

PMID39810765
PMCPMC11725803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.