ArticleCancer management and research2025
Assessing Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography in Jordan According to American College of Radiology (ACR) Standards.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy and localization: initial outcome and a single institution's experience.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer is a significant worldwide health issue, particularly in Jordan, where early detection via mammography is essential for effective disease management. Despite the little radiation risk associated with mammography, it is crucial to monitor radiation exposure to guarantee patient safety. This study intends to assess skin entrance exposure and compute the Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) in mammography units to determine adherence to established criteria and pinpoint areas for enhancement. Methods: To assess MGD, the study utilized the American College of Radiologists (ACR) phantom alongside a RaySafe X2 MAM dosimeter. Measurements of entrance kerma and half-value layer (HVL) were taken across 25 mammography units in Jordan. The MGD was calculated according to the ACR's 2018 protocol, which provides a standardized approach to ensure accurate and comparable dose estimations. These measurements were then analyzed against the ACR's threshold of 3 mGy to assess compliance. Results: The study found that the average MGD across all units was 2.3 mGy, with individual values ranging from 0.95 to 4.10 mGy. Although 67% of the units maintained MGD values within the ACR threshold, 33% exceeded the recommended limit of 3 mGy. Higher MGD values were particularly common in non-accredited facilities, where the average MGD reached 2.7 mGy, compared to 1.6 mGy in accredited units, suggesting gaps in quality control and adherence to best practices in non-accredited centers. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the critical role of accreditation and adherence to quality standards in maintaining safe and effective mammography practices. While most mammography units in Jordan meet the ACR's recommended MGD limits, the elevated dose levels in some non-accredited facilities highlight the need for more rigorous implementation of accreditation standards. Improving compliance with established guidelines will enhance breast cancer screening effectiveness, ultimately supporting better early detection and outcomes for breast cancer in Jordan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.