ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2025
Novel Machine-Learning Modeling of Facial Trauma Volume With Regional Event and Weather Data.
Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFacial trauma volume is difficult to predict accurately. We aim to understand the capacity of climate and regional events to predict daily facial trauma volume. This can provide epidemiologic understanding and subsequently tailor workforce distribution and scheduling. STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingSingle Tertiary Academic Medical Center.
methodsFacial trauma consults between 2017 and 2023 were extracted from a single Level I Trauma Center. Publicly accessible data on local concerts, National Hockey League games, National Football League games, and weather data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data were merged with trauma data. Machine-learning random-forest (RF) plot feature identification was used to identify variables to model high-volume facial trauma days (greater than 75th percentile).
resultsFor analysis, 2342 days were included. The median number of facial trauma consults was 3.0 (interquartile range: 2.0-5.0). The month of May exhibited the highest rate of high-volume trauma days (13% of days, P < .001). On RF feature identification, the strongest predictive factors included weekend day status, average temperature, precipitation, hail, high/damaging winds, and holidays. Regional events were not included in the final models. On stepwise logistic regression modeling with pertinent variables, weekend day (odds ratio [OR]: 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80-2.69, P < .001), average temperature (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02, P < .001), and wind speed (0.97, 0.93-1.00, P = .049) were the only statistically significant variables.
conclusionClimate data were the primary factor that had predictive capacity for high-volume facial trauma days, more so than regional events. Testing models prospectively will help validate such models and help inform staffing for facial trauma coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.