Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810680›Full record

ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2025

The current clinical approach to feeding and eating disorders aimed to increase personalization of management.

Ulrike H Schmidt, Angelica Claudino, Fernando Fernández-Aranda, Katrin E Giel, Jess Griffiths, Phillipa J Hay, Youl-Ri Kim, Jane Marshall, Nadia Micali, Alessio Maria Monteleone and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Emotion-Related Treatments in Patients With Binge Eating Episodes-a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Family Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa With Emerging Adults: A Retrospective Case Series in Routine Clinical Care.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Participation in the New Maudsley Model Workshops is Associated With Reductions in Caregiver Burden in Eating Disorders.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical staging for eating disorders: A scoping review and update.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ulrike H SchmidtCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Angelica ClaudinoEating Disorders Section, Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando Fernández-ArandaClinical Psychology Department, University Hospital of Bellvitge-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona and CIBERobn, Barcelona, Spain.
Katrin E GielCentre of Excellence for Eating Disorders, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Jess GriffithsSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Phillipa J HayTranslational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Youl-Ri KimDepartment of Psychiatry, llsan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Jane MarshallSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nadia MicaliCenter for Eating and Feeding Disorders Research, Mental Health Center Ballerup, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alessio Maria MonteleoneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Michiko NakazatoDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan.
Joanna SteinglassDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Tracey D WadeInstitute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Stephen WonderlichSanford Center for Biobehavioral Research, Fargo, ND, USA.
Stephan ZipfelCentre of Excellence for Eating Disorders, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Karina L AllenCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Helen SharpeSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

The Neurocognitive Reward Learning Mechanisms of Binge EatingP20GM134969 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH NORTH · PI WONDERLICH, STEPHEN ARTHUR · 2021 to 2025
$11.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM134969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feeding and eating disorders (FEDs) are a heterogeneous grouping of disorders at the mind-body interface, with typical onset from childhood into emerging adulthood. They occur along a spectrum of disordered eating and compensatory weight management behaviors, and from low to high body weight. Psychiatric comorbidities are the norm. In contrast to other major psychiatric disorders, first-line treatments for FEDs are mainly psychological and/or nutrition-focused, with medications playing a minor adjunctive role. Patients, carers and clinicians all have identified personalization of treatment as a priority. Yet, for all FEDs, the evidence base supporting this personalization is limited. Importantly, disordered eating and related behaviors can have serious physical consequences and may put the patient's life at risk. In these cases, immediate safety and risk management considerations may at least for a period need to be prioritized over other efforts at personalization of care. This paper systematically reviews several key domains that may be relevant to the characterization of the individual patient with a FED aimed at personalization of management. These domains include symptom profile, clinical subtypes, severity, clinical staging, physical complications and consequences, antecedent and concomitant psychiatric conditions, social functioning and quality of life, neurocognition, social cognition and emotion, dysfunctional cognitive schemata, personality traits, family history, early environmental exposures, recent environmental exposures, stigma, and protective factors. Where possible, validated assessment measures for use in clinical practice are identified. The limitations of the current evidence are pointed out, and possible directions for future research are highlighted. These also include novel and emerging approaches aimed at providing more fine-grained and sophisticated ways to personalize treatment of FEDs, such as those that utilize neurobiological markers. We additionally outline remote measurement technologies designed to delineate patients' illness and recovery trajectories and facilitate development of novel intervention approaches.

Indexed as

anorexia nervosaARFIDbinge eating disorderbulimia nervosaclinical characterizationFeeding and eating disordersOSFEDpersonalization of managementprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID39810680
PMCPMC11733474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.