Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810626›Full record

ArticleBioelectromagnetics2025

Recommendations for the Safe Application of Temporal Interference Stimulation in the Human Brain Part II: Biophysics, Dosimetry, and Safety Recommendations.

Antonino M Cassarà, Taylor H Newton, Katie Zhuang, Sabine J Regel, Peter Achermann, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Niels Kuster, Esra Neufeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioelectromagnetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antonino M CassaràFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3375-7440
Taylor H NewtonFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8429-8702
Katie ZhuangFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sabine J RegelTI Solutions AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Peter AchermannFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alvaro Pascual-LeoneTI Solutions AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Niels KusterFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.
Esra NeufeldFoundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal interference stimulation (TIS) is a new form of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) that has been proposed as a method for targeted, noninvasive stimulation of deep brain structures. While TIS holds promise for a variety of clinical and nonclinical applications, little data is yet available regarding its effects in humans and its mechanisms of action. To inform the design and safe conduct of experiments involving TIS, researchers require quantitative guidance regarding safe exposure limits and other safety considerations. To this end, we undertook a two-part effort to determine frequency-dependent thresholds for applied currents below which TIS is unlikely to pose risk to humans in terms of heating or unwanted stimulation. In Part II of this effort, described here, we draw on a previously compiled list (see Part I) of adverse effects (AEs) reported for transcranial direct/alternating current stimulation (tDCS/ACS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and TIS to determine biophysics-informed exposure metrics for assessing safety. Using an in silico approach, we conduct multiphysics simulations of various tACS, DBS, and TIS exposure scenarios in an anatomically detailed head and brain model. By matching the stimulation in terms of the identified exposure metrics, we infer frequency-dependent TIS parameters that produce exposure conditions equivalent to those known to be safe for tACS and DBS. Based on the results of our simulations and existing knowledge regarding tES and DBS safety, we propose frequency-dependent thresholds below which TIS voltages and currents are unlikely to pose a risk to humans. Safety-related data from ongoing and future human studies are required to verify and refine the thresholds proposed here.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaBrainSafetyTranscranial Direct Current StimulationComputer SimulationDeep Brain StimulationHumansRadiometryTime Factorsdeep brain stimulationelectromagnetic simulationsneurostimulationsafety guidelinestemporal interference

Identifiers

PMID39810626
PMCPMC11733664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.