ArticleCancer research and treatment2025
Factors Associated with Smoking Cessation of Participants in the National Lung Cancer Screening Program in Korea.
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSmoking cessation interventions for participants in lung cancer screening are essential for increasing the effectiveness of screening to reduce lung cancer mortality. This study aimed to investigate the factors that lead to smoking cessation after lung cancer screening. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe Korean National Lung Cancer Screening (KNLCS) Satisfaction Survey was conducted from 2021 to 2022 with approximately 1,000 samples per year among participants in KNLCS targeting 30 or more pack-year smokers. Factors associated with smoking cessation were analyzed based on the survey.
resultsAmong 1,525 current smokers in the survey participants, 728 (47.7%) received screening result counseling from physician after screening and showed significantly higher smoking cessation rate than non-counseling participants (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27 to 3.70). The participants who considered the counseling helpful were more likely to quit smoking (OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 2.00 to 6.22) and to reduce smoking amount (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.54 to 2.71). Similarly, those who received physicians' active recommendations to quit smoking were likely to quit smoking (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.87) and to decrease smoking amount (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.68). In contrast, participants who had no abnormal findings from screening tended to have no significant change in smoking status despite the physicians' active recommendations to quit smoking.
conclusionPhysicians' active recommendations and effective counseling to quit smoking could be a key factor in increasing smoking cessation among lung cancer screening participants. Further research should be conducted to develop more effective strategies for smoking cessation to participants without abnormal findings in lung cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.