Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810456›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2025

Factors associated with true-positive and false-positive diagnoses of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia in 100 consecutive referrals from specialist physicians.

Joshua Flavell, Emily G M Ahern, Benignus Logan, Thomas B Shaw, Robert J Adam, Caitlin A T McElligott, Peter J Nestor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Diagnostic Role of FDG-PET in Dementias Presenting with Language and Behavioral Symptom.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua FlavellThe Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2999-987X
Emily G M AhernThe Mater Memory and Cognitive Disorders Clinic, The Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Benignus LoganThe Mater Memory and Cognitive Disorders Clinic, The Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Thomas B ShawRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital and Surgical, Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Robert J AdamCentre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Caitlin A T McElligottThe Mater Memory and Cognitive Disorders Clinic, The Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Peter J NestorThe Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5860-5921

Funding

Mater FoundationVonnie Healy Research Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a challenging diagnosis due to overlapping symptoms with psychiatric and other neurological conditions. Accordingly, misdiagnosis is common. The present study aimed to identify clinical factors contributing to misdiagnoses of bvFTD by specialist physicians.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed 100 consecutive referrals by specialist physicians (primarily psychiatrists, neurologists and geriatricians) to a tertiary cognitive disorders clinic specializing in frontotemporal lobar degenerative disorders. Patients were included if the referring specialist suspected bvFTD or if bvFTD was confirmed as the final diagnosis. Diagnostic factors were assessed by comparing the initial referral information with final clinical diagnoses.

resultsOf the 100 patients, 34 were true-positive and 66 were false-positive for bvFTD. False-positive diagnoses were often based on misinterpretation of neuroimaging, particularly nuclear imaging (FDG-PET and HMPAO-SPECT), where subjective interpretation errors led to incorrect bvFTD diagnoses in 32 patients. Cognitive testing also contributed to misdiagnosis, with formal neuropsychological testing incorrectly leading to a bvFTD diagnosis in 20 patients. Patients with prior psychiatric histories were more likely to be misdiagnosed. Observable behavioural features of bvFTD and physical neurological signs were significantly more prevalent in true-positive patients.

conclusionsMisinterpretation of neuroimaging and cognitive testing, in particular formal neuropsychological testing, significantly contributed to false-positive bvFTD diagnoses. Physicians should be cautious not to over-interpret neuroimaging and neuropsychology studies and be wary of patients with prior psychiatric histories. In contrast, greater weight should be placed on objective clinical observations of behavioural signs of bvFTD and the emergence of physical neurological signs.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ErrorsFrontotemporal DementiaAgedAged, 80 and overFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingNeuropsychological TestsReferral and ConsultationRetrospective Studiesfrontotemporal dementiamisdiagnosisneuroimagingneuropsychology

Identifiers

PMID39810456
PMCPMC11733081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.