Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810396›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Verification of the Reliability of an Automated Urine Test Strip Colorimetric Program Using Colorimetric Analysis: Survey Study.

Keigo Inagaki, Daisuke Tsuriya, Takuya Hashimoto, Katsumasa Nakamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keigo Inagaki *Clinical Nursing, Gerontological Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Chuo-ku, Hamamatsu city, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan, 81 053 435 2511.ORCID 0000-0002-4479-1241
Daisuke Tsuriya *Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu City, Chuo-ku, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-7891-5046
Takuya HashimotoHamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu City, Chuo-ku, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6761-0343
Katsumasa NakamuraHamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu City, Chuo-ku, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2090-881X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: One method for noninvasive and simple urinary microalbumin testing is urine test strips. However, when visually assessing urine test strips, accurate assessment may be difficult due to environmental influences-such as lighting color and intensity-and the physical and psychological influences of the assessor. These complicate the formation of an objective assessment. objectives: This study developed an "automated urine test strip colorimetric program" (hereinafter referred to as "this program") to objectively assess urine test strips. Using this program may allow urine tests to be conducted at home. In this study, urine samples from hospitalized or outpatient patients were randomly obtained, and the reliability of this program was verified by comparing the agreement rate between this program and an automatic urine analyzer (US-3500 [Eiken Chemical Co, Ltd] and LABOSPECT 006 [Hitachi High-Tech Co, Ltd]). Furthermore, the sensitivity and specificity of the urine albumin test were investigated, and its applicability to screening for microalbuminuria was verified. Methods: A urine test strip was placed in a photography box with constant light intensity and color temperature conditions. The image taken with a smartphone camera on top of the photography box was judged by this program. This program used Accelerated KAZE to perform image-matching processing to reduce the effect of misalignment during photography. It also calculated and judged the item with the smallest color difference between the color chart and the urine test strip using the CIEDE2000 color difference formula. The agreement rate of the results of this program was investigated using the results of an automatic urine analyzer as the gold standard. Results: Compared with the judgments of an automatic urine analyzer, the average agreement rate for 12 items (protein, glucose, urobilinogen, bilirubin, ketone bodies, specific gravity, occult blood, pH, white blood cells, nitrite, creatinine, and albumin) was 78.6%. Furthermore, the average agreement rate of the 12 items within ±1 rank was 95.4%. The results showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 58.6% in determining albumin in urine, which is important for determining the stage of diabetic nephropathy. Finally, the area under the curve (0.907) derived from the receiver operating characteristic curve was satisfactory. Conclusions: The program developed by the authors can determine urine test strips without requiring calibration in a certain shooting environment. If this program can be used at home to perform urinary microalbumin tests, the early detection and treatment of diabetic nephropathy may prevent the condition from becoming severe.

Indexed as

AlbuminuriaColorimetryReagent StripsUrinalysisAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityReagent Stripsautomatic urine analyzercolorimetriccolorimetric analysisevaluationmobile phonequasi-experimental studyreliabilityurinalysisurinaryurineurine test strip

Identifiers

PMID39810396
PMCPMC11750113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.