ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025
Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a physical activity intervention in adults with lymphoma undergoing treatment.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01719562 (Improving Exercise Capacity With a Tailored Physical Activity Intervention in Lymphoma and Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment - An Addendum to NIH R01CA167821 "Early Imaging Detection of Cardiovascular Injury After Cancer"), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Exercise Capacity With a Tailored Physical Activity Intervention in Lymphoma and Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment - An Addendum to NIH R01CA167821 "Early Imaging Detection of Cardiovascular Injury After Cancer"
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balancing Oncological Care and Quality of Life: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Qualitative Study of Breast Cancer and Lymphoma Patients Participating in a Physical Activity Intervention: The Case for Tailored Physical Activity.Cancer medicine · 2026Observational
- Exercise During Chemotherapy Treatment as an Adjuvant Programme in Patients With Lymphoma (EDONOLA): Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a 6-month tailored non-linear progressive physical activity intervention (PAI) for lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy.
methodsPatients newly diagnosed with lymphoma (non-Hodgkin (NHL) or Hodgkin (HL)) were randomized into the PAI or healthy living intervention (HLI) control (2:1). Feasibility was assessed by examining accrual, adherence, and retention rates. Participants completed assessments of exercise capacity (VO
resultsOne hundred and forty-five individuals were screened with 23 of 84 eligible patients agreeing to participate (27%). Three participants withdrew before baseline testing. Out of the 20 participants randomized to the PAI (n = 13) and HLI groups (n = 7), 18 completed the intervention resulting in an overall retention rate of 78%. The adherence rates to the PAI and HLI were 85% and 87%, respectively. One non-serious adverse event was registered. VO
conclusionsImplementing a tailored PAI in adults with lymphoma during active treatment is feasible, was well received by participants and shows preliminary efficacy for limiting a decline in function during treatment. Potential Implications for Cancer Survivors: Physical activity may be beneficial for improving exercise capacity and health-related quality of life in patients undergoing chemotherapy.
trial registration#NCT01719562 ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered July 2, 2019-retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.