ArticleBMC cancer2025
Prospective clinical evidence from over 1,000 pan-cancer patients: a complement to fosaprepitant in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing Antiemetic Strategies Across Phases of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Real-World Evidence in Breast Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChemotherapy-induced nausea and/or vomiting (CINV) is an intractable adverse effect of anticancer drugs. Although prophylactic use of fosaprepitant may be effective in reducing CINV, there is a lack of studies evaluating the application of fosaprepitant in real world. AIMS AND
methodsThis study prospectively observed the effectiveness and safety for the prophylaxis of CINV in a real-world clinical setting. A single dose fosaprepitant 150 mg was intravenously administered to enrolled patients 30 min prior to the chemotherapy drug. Initial data were recorded and patients were followed for 120 h (5 days). The primary endpoint is the complete response (CR) rate and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). The second endpoint is the use of rescue therapy. We also performed stratified analyses to investigate the impact of different factors on fosaprepitant for the prevention of CINV in the acute phase.
resultsBetween March 2021 to August 2021, 1001 patients were enrolled in this study. CR was 77.32%, 93.61%, and 76.72% for vomiting control in 0-24 h, 24-120 h, and 0-120 h respectively, and 97.4%, 99.1%, and 96.9% for nausea control. No SAEs were recorded. 23.48% or 3.1% of patients needed rescue therapy for vomiting or nausea control respectively, most of which occurred in the acute phase. CR rate decreased with increasing emetogenicity of chemotherapeutic agents.
conclusionsSingle-dose fosaprepitant has shown good performance in real-world clinical practice. This study is the first to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of fosaprepitant for the prevention of CINV in a real-world clinical setting and may be a good complement to the clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.