Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810160›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2025

Head-mounted camera as a debriefing tool for surgical simulation-based training: a randomized controlled study in Senegal.

Abdourahmane Ndong, Adja C Diallo, Armaun D Rouhi, Diago A Dia, Sebastian Leon, Cheikhou Dieng, Mohamed L Diao, Jacques N Tendeng, Noel N Williams, Mamadou Cissé and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Abdourahmane NdongDepartment of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal. abdourahmane.ndong@ugb.edu.sn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8103-1375
Adja C DialloDepartment of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Armaun D RouhiDivision of Surgical Education, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Diago A DiaDepartment of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Sebastian LeonDivision of Surgical Education, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cheikhou DiengDepartment of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Mohamed L DiaoDepartment of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Jacques N TendengDepartment of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Noel N WilliamsDivision of Surgical Education, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mamadou CisséDepartment of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Kristoffel R DumonDivision of Surgical Education, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ibrahima KonatéDepartment of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVideo feedback, particularly with a head-mounted camera, has previously been described as a useful debriefing tool in well-funded health systems but has never been performed in a low-resource environment. The purpose of this randomized, intervention-controlled study is to evaluate the feasibility of using video feedback with a head-mounted camera during intestinal anastomosis simulation training in a low-resource setting. METHODOLOGY: This study recruited 14 first-year surgery residents in Senegal, who were randomized into control and camera groups. Both groups received reading materials and video lectures before performing a manual end-to-end intestinal anastomosis using a synthetic model. The control group received oral feedback, while the camera group's first attempt was recorded, reviewed, and discussed before the second attempt. The primary outcomes were OSATS scores and completion time.

resultsThere were no significant demographic differences between the groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in OSATS scores from the first to the second attempt (control group: p = 0.002; camera group: p = 0.0021). The camera group demonstrated a significant reduction in completion time on the second attempt (p = 0.0038), unlike the control group (p = 0.17). Both groups reported increased confidence in performing the task (control group: p = 0.003; camera group: p = 0.0029) and had positive perceptions of the workshop's effectiveness.

conclusionThis pilot study suggests that video feedback with a head-mounted camera is feasible and effective for debriefing during intestinal anastomosis simulation training in a low-resource setting, offering a low-cost, effective way to enhance technical skills. Further research with larger sample sizes is recommended to validate these findings and explore long-term impacts on surgical proficiency.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalFormative FeedbackSimulation TrainingVideo RecordingAdultClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementFeasibility StudiesFeedbackFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleSenegalCameraFeedbackHead-mounted deviceSurgerySurgical simulation

Identifiers

PMID39810160
PMCPMC11731528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.