Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810123›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Social issues in general practice - a survey assessing the interprofessional perspective of general practitioners and social workers regarding frequency, challenges, and needs.

Tonia Gerber, Laura Diaz Hernandez, René Rüegg, Dunja Vetter, Andreas Zeller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tonia GerberCentre for Primary Health Care, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. tonia.gerber@ksbl.ch.
Laura Diaz HernandezCentre for Primary Health Care, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
René RüeggBern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.
Dunja VetterCaritas Basel Beider Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas ZellerCentre for Primary Health Care, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth or illness and social issues cannot be viewed in isolation. Social problems can influence well-being and disease. General Practitioners (GPs) are requested to offer counselling opportunities to respond to the social issues of their patients adequately. Counselling on non-medical issues in general practice increases GPs' workload. The study aimed to analyse the occurrence of social problems as well as the strengths and weaknesses of existing working agreements between social services and GPs in primary care.

methodsWe carried out a cross-sectional online survey between December 2022 and January 2023 among a sample of Swiss GPs from the Sentinella-Network, the uniham-bb-Network and social workers from the SAGES-Network.

resultsFindings come from a sample of 143 GPs (mean age 54 years, 37.8% female) and 41 social workers (mean age 43 years, 75.6% female). GPs face a median of 3 patients with social problems per week (IQR 5.2). They reported encountering patients facing "Finance" issues most frequently, with 78.8% encountering such cases between "more than 3 patients per week" and "1-3 patients per month". "Work" (76.4%) and "Loneliness" (73.7%) were also among the most commonly encountered social problems. When suspecting the problem, GPs more often addressed the issue if it was about "Addiction" (83.2%), "Loneliness" (72.3%), or "Protection" (71.4%). More than half of GPs (56.0%) reported having contact with social workers less than once a month, while approximately half of the social workers reported having contact with GPs 1 to 3 times a month (48.7%). GPs (69.3%) and social workers (76.3%) would like more contact. The most frequently mentioned benefits of an increased collaboration from the GPs' perspective were "improved quality of care (more time for medical issues)" (64.8%) and "improved mental health of patients" (55.6%).

conclusionsSocial problems in general practice are common, but the interprofessional cooperation between GPs and social workers is scarce. However, both parties appear to be in favour of closer interprofessional collaboration and seem to be willing to attempt to improve joint patient care in the future. The integration of social workers into general practice is promising for a comprehensive, interprofessional, and preventative patient approach to providing the best healthcare.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersInterprofessional RelationsSocial WorkersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial WorkSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandGeneral practiceGeneral practitionerInterprofessional cooperationSocial problemsSocial worker

Identifiers

PMID39810123
PMCPMC11731376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.