Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810093›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2025

Don't assume, ask! A focus group study on end-of-life care planning with people with intellectual disabilities from minoritised ethnic groups.

Andrea Bruun, Leon Jordan, Jo Giles, Rhidian Hughes, Rebecca Anderson-Kittow, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea BruunKingston University London, London, United Kingdom. a.bruun@kingston.ac.uk.
Leon JordanKingston University London, London, United Kingdom.
Jo GilesKingston University London, London, United Kingdom.
Rhidian HughesVoluntary Organisations Disability Group, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca Anderson-KittowKingston University London, London, United Kingdom.
Irene Tuffrey-WijneKingston University London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research for Social Care (RfSC), Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme NIHR202963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with intellectual disabilities are less likely to have access to palliative care, and the evidence shows that their deaths are often unanticipated, unplanned for, and poorly managed. Within the general population, people from minoritised ethnic groups are under-represented within palliative care services. End-of-life care planning with people with intellectual disabilities from minoritised ethnic groups may be a way to address these issues. There is a huge gap in the evidence regarding intersectionality of intellectual disability and ethnicity within end-of-life care planning. This study explored the characteristics of effective and preferred end-of-life care planning approaches and resources for people with intellectual disabilities from minoritised ethnic groups.

methodsNine focus groups and three semi-structured individual interviews were held with 41 participants from minoritised ethnic groups (11 family carers; 25 support staff; and five people with intellectual disabilities). Session recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the framework analytical approach.

resultsParticipants thought that end-of-life care planning practices were dependent on the person's culture, ethnicity, and religion, and that it was important to follow these at the end-of-life. They deemed it important to discover and respect (and not assume) the individual's perspectives, values, needs, and wishes through a person-centred approach. Cultural attitudes to talking about death could hinder end-of-life care planning as participants perceived it as taboo. Disagreement was described as hindering end-of-life care planning, particularly when strong feelings about cultural and religious practices were involved. Staff highlighted the need for cultural and religious awareness, which could involve seeking information and receiving training. Opening the conversation about death and dying was seen as a potential facilitator for exploring end-of-life care planning.

conclusionsThe study was committed to addressing issues of equity, diversity, and inclusion. It is the first study to explore perspectives on end-of-life care planning with people with intellectual disabilities from minoritised ethnic groups. It was deemed important that staff did not assume but discovered and respected the views and preferences of people with intellectual disabilities regarding culture and religion. There is an urgent need for more research into end-of-life care planning with people with intellectual disabilities from minoritised ethnic groups.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningEthnicityIntellectual DisabilityMinority GroupsTerminal CareAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchDeathEnd-of-life care planningIntellectual disabilityMinoritised ethnic groupsPalliative careSocial careSocial services

Identifiers

PMID39810093
PMCPMC11731549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.