ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Ultrasonographic evaluation of optic nerve sheath diameter in patients severe traumatic brain injury: a comparison with intraparenchymal pressure monitoring.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Changes in Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter on Computed Tomography Predict Decompressive Efficacy and Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring using optic nerve sheath diameter and the Brain4Care system.Brain & spine · 2026Review
- Article
- Optic nerve sheath diameter measurement in healthy South Iranian adults from a cross-sectional ultrasonographic study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIncreased intracranial pressure (ICP) can worsen the clinical condition of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. One non-invasive and easily bedside-performed technique to estimate ICP is ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). This study aimed to analyze ONSD and correlate it with ICP values obtained by intraparenchymal monitoring to establish the ONSD threshold value for elevated ICP and reference range of ONSD in severe TBI patients.
methodsForty severe TBI patients (Glasgow Coma Scale Score ≤ 8) were included. Ultrasonographic measurement of ONSD was performed and compared with intraparenchymal ICP monitoring to assess their association and determine the ONSD threshold value. Exclusion criteria included individuals under eighteen years old, penetrating TBI, or direct ocular trauma.
resultsFifty-three ONSD measurements were conducted in all patients. The mean ONSD value in the group with intracranial pressure < 20 mmHg was 5.4 mm ± 1.0, while in the group with intracranial pressure ≥ 20 mmHg, it was 6.4 mm ± 0.7 (p = 0.0026). A positive and statistically significant correlation, albeit weak (r = 0.33), was observed between ultrasonographic measurement of ONSD and intraparenchymal ICP monitoring. The statistical analysis of the ROC curve identified the best cut-off as 6.18 mm, with 77.8% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity.
conclusionOur results reveal a positive, albeit weak, correlation between ultrasonographic measurement of ONSD and intraparenchymal ICP monitoring, with an ONSD threshold value of 6.18 mm. Achieving only 77.8% sensitivity and considering the substantial variability between ONSD measurements (standard deviation at 1.0) might limit the reliability of ICP assessment based solely on ONSD measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39810071What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.