ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Effect of hearing experience on preschool-aged children's eye gaze to a talker during spoken language processing.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Speechreading-gathering speech information from talkers' faces-supports speech perception when speech acoustics are degraded. Benefitting from speechreading, however, requires listeners to visually fixate talkers during face-to-face interactions. The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that preschool-aged children allocate their eye gaze to a talker when speech acoustics are degraded. We implemented a looking-while-listening paradigm to quantify children's eye gaze to an unfamiliar female talker and two images of familiar objects presented on a screen while the children listened to speech. We tested 31 children (12 girls), ages 26-48 months, who had normal hearing (NH group, n = 19) or bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and used hearing devices (D/HH group, n = 12). Children's eye gaze was video-recorded as the talker verbally labeled one of the images, either in quiet or in the presence of an unfamiliar two-talker male speech masker. Children's eye gaze to the target image, distractor image, and female talker was coded every 33 ms off-line by trained observers. Bootstrapped differences of time series (BDOTS) analyses and ternary plots were used to determine differences in visual fixations of the talker between listening conditions in the NH and D/HH groups. Results suggest that the NH group visually fixated the talker more in the masker condition than in quiet. We did not observe statistically discernable differences in visual fixations of the talker between the listening conditions for the D/HH group. Gaze patterns of the NH group in the masker condition looked like gaze patterns of the D/HH group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.