Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39810042›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

ROAR-CAT: Rapid Online Assessment of Reading ability with Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Wanjing Anya Ma, Adam Richie-Halford, Amy K Burkhardt, Klint Kanopka, Clementine Chou, Benjamin W Domingue, Jason D Yeatman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reading ability conflates SES creativity gaps.NPJ science of learning · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wanjing Anya MaStanford University Graduate School of Education, 520 Galvez Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. wanjingm@stanford.edu.
Adam Richie-HalfordDivision of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Amy K BurkhardtDivision of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Klint KanopkaStanford University Graduate School of Education, 520 Galvez Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Clementine ChouStanford University Graduate School of Education, 520 Galvez Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Benjamin W DomingueStanford University Graduate School of Education, 520 Galvez Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Jason D YeatmanStanford University Graduate School of Education, 520 Galvez Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

Neural mechanisms of successful intervention in children with dyslexiaR01HD095861 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI YEATMAN, JASON D · 2019 to 2024
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD095861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rapid Online Assessment of Reading (ROAR) is a web-based lexical decision task that measures single-word reading abilities in children and adults without a proctor. Here we study whether item response theory (IRT) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) can be used to create a more efficient online measure of word recognition. To construct an item bank, we first analyzed data taken from four groups of students (N = 1960) who differed in age, socioeconomic status, and language-based learning disabilities. The majority of item parameters were highly consistent across groups (r = .78-.94), and six items that functioned differently across groups were removed. Next, we implemented a JavaScript CAT algorithm and conducted a validation experiment with 485 students in grades 1-8 who were randomly assigned to complete trials of all items in the item bank in either (a) a random order or (b) a CAT order. We found that, to achieve reliability of 0.9, CAT improved test efficiency by 40%: 75 CAT items produced the same standard error of measurement as 125 items in a random order. Subsequent validation in 32 public school classrooms showed that an approximately 3-min ROAR-CAT can achieve high correlations (r = .89 for first grade, r = .73 for second grade) with alternative 5-15-min individually proctored oral reading assessments. Our findings suggest that ROAR-CAT is a promising tool for efficiently and accurately measuring single-word reading ability. Furthermore, our development process serves as a model for creating adaptive online assessments that bridge research and practice.

Indexed as

InternetReadingAdolescentAlgorithmsChildFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsComputerized adaptive testingDyslexiaLexical decision taskPsychometricsScreening toolsWord recognition

Identifiers

PMID39810042
PMCPMC11732908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.