ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: the role of ICG fluorescence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Indocyanine Green as a Single Tracer for Axillary Staging in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Optimization of Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Mapping with Indocyanine Green for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Stability and Selectivity of Indocyanine Green Towards Photodynamic Therapy of CRL-2314 Breast Cancer Cells with Minimal Toxicity to HTB-125 Cells.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From Gamma Rays to Green Light: Comparative Efficacy of Indocyanine Green and Technetium-99m in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence as an alternative to traditional sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) techniques in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Specifically, the study aimed to assess sentinel node identification rates and the effectiveness of ICG in axillary staging without the use of radioactive tracers.
methodsThis retrospective study included 71 BC patients treated with NAC, who underwent SLNB using ICG fluorescence between 2020 and 2024. ICG was injected intradermally around the nipple-areolar complex, and the lymphatic pathways were visualized with a fluorescence camera. SN identification rate (IR) and retrieval of three or more SNs were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.
resultsICG-guided SNs were identified in 91.5% of patients, with a median retrieval time of 25 min (range: 10-50). Three or more SNs were successfully collected among 66.2% of cases and 38% of patients achieved a complete pathological response to NAC, while 53.5% had partial responses. Metastatic SNs were found in 21.1% of patients, and no serious intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed.
conclusionICG fluorescence-guided SLNB proved to be a feasible and promising method for SNs identification among BC patients after NAC. While ICG shows potential as an alternative to traditional techniques, further studies are required to confirm these findings and to establish ICG role in post-NAC axillary staging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.