ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Robust estimation of the latent trait in graded response models.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aberrant responses (e.g., careless responses, miskeyed items, etc.) often contaminate psychological assessments and surveys. Previous robust estimators for dichotomous IRT models have produced more accurate latent trait estimates with data containing response disturbances. However, for widely used Likert-type items with three or more response categories, a robust estimator for estimating latent traits does not exist. We propose a robust estimator for the graded response model (GRM) that can be applied to Likert-type items. Two weighting mechanisms for downweighting "suspicious" responses are considered: the Huber and the bisquare weight functions. Simulations reveal the estimator reduces bias for various test lengths, numbers of response categories, and types of response disturbances. The reduction in bias and stable standard errors suggests that the robust estimator for the GRM is effective in counteracting the harmful effects of response disturbances and providing more accurate scores on psychological assessments. The robust estimator is then applied to data from the Big Five Inventory-2 (Ober et al., 2021) to demonstrate its use. Potential applications and implications are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.