ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Deep learning empowered sensor fusion boosts infant movement classification.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic Infant Movement Assessment Using Pose-LBP Features and a Cost-Sensitive Subspace kNN Ensemble.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing Low Back Movement with Motion Tape Sensor Data Through Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A machine learning study highlighting the challenges of fidgety movement recognition using vision and inertial sensors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of marker-less 2D image-based methods for infant pose estimation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning empowered sensor fusion boosts infant movement classification.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Identifying Infant Body Position from Inertial Sensors with Machine Learning: Which Parameters Matter?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the integrity of the developing nervous system, the Prechtl general movement assessment (GMA) is recognized for its clinical value in diagnosing neurological impairments in early infancy. GMA has been increasingly augmented through machine learning approaches intending to scale-up its application, circumvent costs in the training of human assessors and further standardize classification of spontaneous motor patterns. Available deep learning tools, all of which are based on single sensor modalities, are however still considerably inferior to that of well-trained human assessors. These approaches are hardly comparable as all models are designed, trained and evaluated on proprietary/silo-data sets.
methodsWith this study we propose a sensor fusion approach for assessing fidgety movements (FMs). FMs were recorded from 51 typically developing participants. We compared three different sensor modalities (pressure, inertial, and visual sensors). Various combinations and two sensor fusion approaches (late and early fusion) for infant movement classification were tested to evaluate whether a multi-sensor system outperforms single modality assessments. Convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures were used to classify movement patterns.
resultsThe performance of the three-sensor fusion (classification accuracy of 94.5%) is significantly higher than that of any single modality evaluated.
conclusionsWe show that the sensor fusion approach is a promising avenue for automated classification of infant motor patterns. The development of a robust sensor fusion system may significantly enhance AI-based early recognition of neurofunctions, ultimately facilitating automated early detection of neurodevelopmental conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.