Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39809834›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Fig abscission as a defense mechanism of Ficus trees against parasitism by non-pollinating fig wasps.

Shang-Yang Lin, Bruno Di Giusto, Anthony Bain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shang-Yang LinInstitute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Bruno Di GiustoJournalism and Mass Communication Program, International College, Ming Chuan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Anthony BainInstitute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. anthonybain22@mail.nsysu.edu.tw.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 104-2311-B-002-031National Science Council 109-2313-B-110-004-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does the fig tree Ficus benguetensis protect its investment in the production of figs and pollinating fig wasps against parasitism from non-pollinating fig wasps? This study documents a previously overlooked defense mechanism: fig abscission-the natural shedding of the fig fruit as a defense mechanism. Our bagging experiments showed that both the absence of pollination and high parasitism levels lead to the abortion of F. benguetensis figs, with positive correlations between parasitism levels, increased abscission rates, and decreased pollinator production. Moreover, we found that high parasitism corresponds to shortened fig development periods until abscission, while medium parasitism levels result in fewer pollinators. Our findings suggest that abscission may function as a resource conservation strategy, as most of the tree's investment in the figs occurs post-pollination. This study uncovers for the first time the use of fig abscission as a unique defense against non-pollinating fig wasp parasites, broadening our understanding of plant defense mechanisms within mutualistic interactions.

Indexed as

FicusTreesWaspsAnimalsFruitHost-Parasite InteractionsPollinationSymbiosisFicusNon-pollinating fig waspPlant defenseSelective abortion

Identifiers

PMID39809834
PMCPMC11732970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.