ArticleNature communications2025
Coordinated representations for naturalistic memory encoding and retrieval in hippocampal neural subspaces.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A large-scale heterogeneous 3D magnetic resonance brain imaging dataset for self-supervised learning.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Cross-modular integration and the missing mechanism in biocultural accounts of language.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Beta bursts mediate amygdala gating of hippocampal emotional encoding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our naturalistic experiences are organized into memories through multiple processes, including novelty encoding, memory formation, and retrieval. However, the neural mechanisms coordinating these processes remain elusive. Using fMRI data acquired during movie viewing and subsequent narrative recall, we examine hippocampal neural subspaces associated with distinct memory processes and characterized their relationships. We quantify novelty in character co-occurrences and the valence of relationships and estimate event memorability. Within the hippocampus, the novelty subspaces encoding each type exhibit partial overlap, and these overlapping novelty subspaces align with the subspace involved in memorability. Notably, following event boundaries, hippocampal states within these subspaces align inversely along a shared coding axis, predicting subsequent recall performance. This novelty-memorability alignment is selectively observed during encoding but not during retrieval. Finally, the identified functional subspaces reflect the intrinsic functional organization of the hippocampus. Our findings offer insights into how the hippocampus dynamically coordinates representations underlying memory encoding and retrieval at the population level to transform ongoing experiences into enduring memories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.