Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39809525›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

Reducing fragmentation of primary healthcare financing for more equitable, people-centred primary healthcare.

Agnes Gatome-Munyua, Susan Sparkes, Gemini Mtei, Martin Sabignoso, Prastuti Soewondo, Pierre Yameogo, Kara Hanson, Cheryl Cashin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Global Health Initiatives and Universal Health Coverage in Pakistan-Aligned for the Future?The International journal of health planning and management · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Evaluating Honduras' health financing system: a comprehensive application of the WHO Health Financing Progress Matrix.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Co-Production, Co-Creation and Co-Design in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review of Design, Implementation, Impact and Sustainability.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Agnes Gatome-MunyuaResults for Development Institute, Nairobi, Kenya amunyua@r4d.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8910-4989
Susan SparkesWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gemini MteiAbt Associates, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Martin SabignosoIndependent Consultant, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Prastuti SoewondoMinistry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Pierre YameogoMinistry of Health and Public Hygiene, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Kara HansonDepartment of Global Health Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Cheryl CashinResults for Development Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-000929Gates Foundation INV-006213World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite primary healthcare (PHC) being recognised in global declarations-Alma Ata in 1978 and Astana in 2018-and prioritised in national health strategies, chronic under-resourcing of PHC persists in most low-income and middle-income countries. More public spending is needed for PHC, but macrofiscal and political constraints often limit the ability of governments to allocate more public resources to PHC. Under-resourcing has been compounded by fragmented and rigid funding flows, which are inefficient and may erode equity, quality of care and public trust in PHC.This article explores the drivers of fragmentation in PHC financing-low public spending, which results in over-reliance on external sources to fund critical health interventions, and the proliferation of new financing schemes that do not take a system-wide view or adhere to the principles of universality. It then highlights some of the possible consequences of this fragmentation for the efficiency, equity and effectiveness of service delivery.Four countries-Argentina, Burkina Faso, Indonesia and Tanzania-are used to illustrate practical steps that may be taken to minimise the consequences of fragmentation in PHC financing: (1) consolidating multiple coverage schemes, (2) avoiding further fragmentation, (3) harmonising health purchasing functions and (4) streamlining funding flows to the provider level.The country examples reveal lessons for policy-makers grappling with the consequences of fragmented PHC financing. The paper concludes with a research agenda to generate additional evidence on what works to address fragmentation.

Indexed as

Healthcare FinancingHealth EquityPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareDeveloping CountriesHumansIndonesiaTanzaniaHealth economicsHealth policyHealth services researchHealth systems

Identifiers

PMID39809525
PMCPMC11749059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.