Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39809466›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.)2025

Mass Spectrometry-Based Applications of Spheroids in Cancer Biology.

Brian D Fries, Amanda B Hummon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian D FriesDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; email: hummon.1@osu.edu.
Amanda B HummonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; email: hummon.1@osu.edu.

Funding

Spatial SILAC: Examining the Proteome in 3D Cell CulturesR01GM110406 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI HUMMON, AMANDA B. · 2014 to 2022
$3.0M
Quantitative top-down proteomics of human colorectal cancer cells and tumorsR01CA247863 · NCI · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HUMMON, AMANDA B., LIU, XIAOWEN · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA247863NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of cell culture techniques to model human disease is an indispensable tool that has helped improve the health and well-being of the world. Monolayer cultures have most often been used for biomedical research, although not accurately recapitulating an in vivo human tumor. Tumor spheroids are a form of three-dimensional cell culture that better mimics an avascularized human tumor through their cell-cell contacts in all directions, development of various chemical gradients, and distinct populations of cells found within the spheroid. In this review, we highlight how mass spectrometry has propelled the utility of the spheroid model to understand cancer biology. We discuss how mass spectrometry imaging can be utilized to determine the penetration efficiency of various chemotherapeutics, how proteomics can be used to understand the biology in the various layers of a spheroid, and how metabolomics and lipidomics are used to elucidate how various spheroids behave toward chemotherapeutics.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryNeoplasmsSpheroids, CellularAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansMetabolomicsProteomicsAntineoplastic Agentscancermass spectrometrymass spectrometry imagingproteomicsspheroidsthree-dimensional cell culture

Identifiers

PMID39809466
PMCPMC12148362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.