Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39809324›Full record

ReviewBiology letters2025

Growing with dinosaurs: a review of dinosaur reproduction and ontogeny.

Kimberley E J Chapelle, Christopher T Griffin, Diego Pol

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dinosaur science.Biology letters · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kimberley E J ChapelleDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9991-0439
Christopher T GriffinDepartment of Geosciences, Princeton University , Princeton, NJ, USA.
Diego PolMuseo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia , Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-9690-7517

Funding

GENUS DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in PalaeosciencesStony Brook University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the start of the twenty-first century, there has been a notable increase in annual publications focusing on dinosaur reproduction and ontogeny with researchers using these data to address a range of macroevolutionary questions about dinosaurs. Ontogeny, which is closely tied to osteological morphological variation, impacts several key research areas, such as taxonomic diversity, population dynamics, palaeoecology, macroevolution, as well as the physiological and reproductive factors driving ecological success. While these broad studies have significantly advanced our understanding of dinosaur evolution, they have also revealed important challenges and areas needing further investigation. In this review, we aim to outline some of these challenges in major research areas linked to dinosaur ontogeny, namely reproductive biology, osteohistological growth strategies, morphological osteological variation and the link between ontogeny and macroevolution. We also offer some recommendations for best practices and promising future research directions. These recommendations include increasing sample sizes through fieldwork and exhaustive use of pre-existing fossil collections, using micro-computed tomography (μCT) scanning methods to increase dataset sizes in a non-destructive manner, methodical collection and reposition of μCT scan data, assessing ontogenetic maturity, establishing consistency in terminology and methods and building comprehensive extant comparative datasets.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDinosaursReproductionAnimalsBone and BonesFossilsX-Ray MicrotomographydevelopmentDinosauriagrowthreproduction

Identifiers

PMID39809324
PMCPMC11732415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.