ReviewBiology letters2025
Growing with dinosaurs: a review of dinosaur reproduction and ontogeny.
Review in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A detailed redescription of a skeletally immature 'Redondasaurus' suggests ontogenetic transformations in the taxon mirror phytosaurian morphological evolution.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026Article
- Article
- Dinosaur science.Biology letters · 2025Article
- The living dinosaur: accomplishments and challenges of reconstructing dinosaur physiology.Biology letters · 2025Review
- Growing with dinosaurs: a review of dinosaur reproduction and ontogeny.Biology letters · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the start of the twenty-first century, there has been a notable increase in annual publications focusing on dinosaur reproduction and ontogeny with researchers using these data to address a range of macroevolutionary questions about dinosaurs. Ontogeny, which is closely tied to osteological morphological variation, impacts several key research areas, such as taxonomic diversity, population dynamics, palaeoecology, macroevolution, as well as the physiological and reproductive factors driving ecological success. While these broad studies have significantly advanced our understanding of dinosaur evolution, they have also revealed important challenges and areas needing further investigation. In this review, we aim to outline some of these challenges in major research areas linked to dinosaur ontogeny, namely reproductive biology, osteohistological growth strategies, morphological osteological variation and the link between ontogeny and macroevolution. We also offer some recommendations for best practices and promising future research directions. These recommendations include increasing sample sizes through fieldwork and exhaustive use of pre-existing fossil collections, using micro-computed tomography (μCT) scanning methods to increase dataset sizes in a non-destructive manner, methodical collection and reposition of μCT scan data, assessing ontogenetic maturity, establishing consistency in terminology and methods and building comprehensive extant comparative datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.