Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39809227›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of nephrology2025

A Pilot, Single-Blinded, Randomized Crossover Trial of Cramp Reduction with Angiotensin II in Maintenance Patients on Hemodialysis (the CRAMP-HD Study).

Atthaphong Phongphithakchai, Rinaldo Bellomo, Peter Mount, Cindy-Anne T Bach, Greta Gurry, Wendy Liu, Akinori Maeda, Nuttapol Pattamin, Yukiko Hikasa, Sofia Spano and 6 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Atthaphong PhongphithakchaiDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, ton331@hotmail.com.
Rinaldo BellomoDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Peter MountDepartment of Nephrology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cindy-Anne T BachDepartment of Nephrology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Greta GurryDepartment of Nephrology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Wendy LiuDepartment of Nephrology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Akinori MaedaDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nuttapol PattaminDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Yukiko HikasaDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sofia SpanoDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anis ChabaDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Glenn EastwoodDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mink ChawlaDepartment of Critical Care, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Arthur J AtkinsonProletariat Therapeutics, Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, USA.
James WilkieProletariat Therapeutics, Inc., Andover, Massachusetts, USA.
Emily J SeeDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAngiotensin II may reduce muscle ischemia during intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and thereby decrease the incidence and/or intensity of intradialytic muscle cramps. We aimed to test whether angiotensin II infusion during IHD is safe, feasible, and effective in the attenuation of muscle cramps.

methodsWe performed a pilot, single-blinded, randomized crossover trial of patients receiving IHD who frequently experience intradialytic muscle cramps. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either intravenous angiotensin II or placebo for the duration of their first dialysis session of the week. They crossed over to the alternate arm each week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes included cramp-related symptoms, hemodynamic parameters, dialysis prescription alterations, and biomarkers.

resultsWe studied 24 sessions in 6 patients. Intradialytic hypertension (systolic blood pressure >180 mm Hg) occurred more often with angiotensin II than with placebo (4/12 sessions, 33% vs. 2/12 sessions, 17% sessions, p = 0.64). There were no other adverse events. Compared with placebo, muscle cramps were less frequent (4/12 sessions, 33% vs. 11/12 sessions, 92% sessions, p = 0.009) and of lower intensity with angiotensin II (median Brief Pain Inventory score 1.4 vs. 5.3; p < 0.001; maximal Brief Pain Inventory score 1.2 vs. 6.0; p < 0.001). Fluid bolus administration for cramps was less common during angiotensin II infusion than placebo (0/12 sessions, 0% vs. 5/12 sessions, 42% sessions, p = 0.037).

conclusionAngiotensin II increased blood pressure and heart rate but not cardiac output or levels of troponin, creatine kinase, or renin. Angiotensin II infusion during IHD appears safe and effective at reducing intradialytic muscle cramps. These observations justify further investigation in larger controlled studies.

Indexed as

Angiotensin IIKidney Failure, ChronicMuscle CrampRenal DialysisVasoconstrictor AgentsAgedCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeAngiotensin IIVasoconstrictor AgentsAngiotensin IIBlood pressureCrampsHemodialysisRenin

Identifiers

PMID39809227
PMCPMC12169806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.