Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39808789›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2025

A Patient-Oriented Implementation Strategy for a Perioperative mHealth Intervention: Feasibility Cohort Study.

Daan Toben, Astrid de Wind, Eva van der Meij, Judith A F Huirne, Johannes R Anema

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daan TobenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3180-3327
Astrid de WindSocietal Participation & Health , Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0022-3805
Eva van der MeijSocietal Participation & Health , Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4905-1867
Judith A F HuirneSocietal Participation & Health , Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8248-2677
Johannes R AnemaDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8657-0917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDay surgery is being increasingly implemented across Europe, driven in part by capacity problems. Patients recovering at home could benefit from tools tailored to their new care setting to effectively manage their convalescence. The mHealth application ikHerstel is one such tool, but although it administers its functions in the home, its implementation hinges on health care professionals within the hospital.

objectiveWe conducted a feasibility study of an additional patient-oriented implementation strategy for ikHerstel. This strategy aimed to empower patients to access and use ikHerstel independently, in contrast to implementation as usual, which hinges on the health care professional acting as gatekeeper. Our research question was "How well are patients able to use ikHerstel independently of their health care professional?"

methodsWe investigated the implementation strategy in terms of its recruitment, reach, dose delivered, dose received, and fidelity. Patients with a recent or prospective elective surgery were recruited using a wide array of materials to simulate patient-oriented dissemination of ikHerstel. Data were collected through web-based surveys. Descriptive analysis and open coding were used to analyze the data.

resultsRecruitment yielded 213 registrations, with 55 patients ultimately included in the study. The sample was characterized by patients undergoing abdominal surgery, with high literacy and above average digital health literacy, and included an overrepresentation of women (48/55, 87%). The implementation strategy had a reach of 81% (63/78), with 87% (55/67) of patients creating a recovery plan. Patients were satisfied with their independent use of ikHerstel, rating it an average 7.0 (SD 1.9) of 10, and 54% (29/54) of patients explicitly reported no difficulties in using it. A major concern of the implementation strategy was conflicts in recommendations between ikHerstel and the health care professionals, as well as the resulting feelings of insecurity experienced by patients.

conclusionsIn this small feasibility study, most patients were satisfied with the patient-oriented implementation strategy. However, the lack of involvement of health care professionals due to the strategy contributed to patient concerns regarding conflicting recommendations between ikHerstel and health care professionals.

Indexed as

Perioperative CareTelemedicineAdultAgedCohort StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescaregiverconvalescencecustomizedigital caredigital healthdigital interventioneHealthelective surgeryfeasibilityhealth interventionhospital caremHealthmobile apppatient carepatient educationpatient-orientedperioperativeperioperative careperioperative medicinerecoverysurgerysurgical caretailortechnology

Identifiers

PMID39808789
PMCPMC11775485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.