Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39808757›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2025

Randomized Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Transurethral Resection for Staging New Bladder Cancers: Results From the Prospective BladderPath Trial.

Richard T Bryan, Wenyu Liu, Sarah J Pirrie, Rashid Amir, Jean Gallagher, Ana I Hughes, Kieran P Jefferson, Allen Knight, Veronica Nanton, Harriet P Mintz and 18 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Current Status and Future Perspective for Bladder Cancer MR Imaging and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in Japan: Challenges and Solutions.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. What's next for VI-RADS? Updates and future perspectives from the ACR VI-RADS steering committee.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Advances in the management of localized bladder cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Richard T BryanBladder Cancer Research Centre, Department of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2853-4293
Wenyu LiuThe Translational Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6682-2053
Sarah J PirrieCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2894-2230
Rashid AmirUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jean GallagherPatient Representative, Tetbury, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0007-6308-2292
Ana I HughesCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7274-9422
Kieran P JeffersonUniversity Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0029-8359
Allen KnightPatient Representative, Tetbury, United Kingdom.
Veronica NantonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Harriet P MintzMRC Clinical Trials Unit, UCL, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1583-6268
Ann M PopeCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7458-3294
Jacob CherianThe Royal Oldham Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Oldham, United Kingdom.
Kingsley EkwuemeBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board-Glan Clwyd Hospital, Rhyl, United Kingdom.
Lyndon GommersallUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands-Royal Stoke Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Giles HellawellLondon North West University Healthcare NHS Trust-Northwick Park Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Paul Hunter-CampbellUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust-Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Gokul Kanda SwamySwansea Bay University Health Board-Morriston Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9071-0644
Sanjeev KotwalLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust-St James' University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Vivekanandan KumarNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
David MakThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust-New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0638-1185
Amar MoheeManchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2672-618X
Thiagarajan NambirajanWirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust-Arrowe Park Hospital, Birkenhead, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4278-7126
Douglas G WardBladder Cancer Research Centre, Department of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Steven J KennishSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
James W F CattoSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2787-8828
Prashant PatelUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2882-5990
Nicholas D JamesInstitute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7314-8204
BladderPath Collaborative Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTransurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is the initial staging procedure for new bladder cancers (BCs). For muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBCs), TURBT may delay definitive treatment. We investigated whether definitive treatment can be expedited for MIBC using flexible cystoscopic biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for initial staging. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a prospective open-label, randomized study conducted within 17 UK hospitals (registered as ISRCTN 35296862). Participants with suspected new BC were randomly assigned 1:1 to TURBT-staged or mpMRI-staged care, with minimization factors of sex, age, and clinician visual assessment of stage. Blinding was not possible. Patients unable/unwilling to undergo mpMRI or with previous BC were ineligible. The study had two stages with separate primary outcomes of feasibility and time to correct treatment (TTCT) for MIBC, respectively.

resultsBetween May 31, 2018, and December 31, 2021, 638 patients were screened, and 143 participants randomly assigned to TURBT (n = 72; 55 males, 15 MIBCs) or initial mpMRI (n = 71; 53 males, 14 MIBCs). For feasibility, 36 of 39 (92% [95% CI, 79 to 98]) participants with suspected MIBC underwent mpMRI. The median TTCT for participants with MIBC was significantly shorter with initial mpMRI (n = 12, 53 days [95% CI, 20 to 89]

conclusionThe mpMRI-directed pathway led to a 45-day reduction in TTCT for MIBC. Incorporating mpMRI ahead of TURBT into the standard pathway was beneficial for all patients with suspected MIBC.

Indexed as

CystectomyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overCystoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39808757
PMCPMC12005870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.