Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39808668›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Identifying depression subtypes and investigating their consistency and transitions in a 1-year cohort analysis.

Carolin Oetzmann, Nicholas Cummins, Femke Lamers, Faith Matcham, Sara Siddi, Katie M White, Josep Maria Haro, Srinivasan Vairavan, Brenda W J H Penninx, Vaibhav A Narayan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carolin OetzmannKing's College London-Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-917X
Nicholas CumminsKing's College London-Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Femke LamersDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Faith MatchamSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, United Kingdom.
Sara SiddiParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Katie M WhiteKing's College London-Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Josep Maria HaroParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Srinivasan VairavanJanssen Research and Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7975-8436
Brenda W J H PenninxDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vaibhav A NarayanDavos Alzheimer's Collaborative, Geneva, Switzerland.
Matthew HotopfKing's College London-Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.
Ewan CarrKing's College London-Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is defined by an array of symptoms that make it challenging to understand the condition at a population level. Subtyping offers a way to unpick this phenotypic diversity for improved disorder characterisation. We aimed to identify depression subtypes longitudinally using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: Self-Report (IDS-SR). A secondary analysis of a two-year cohort study called Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse in Major Depressive Disorder (RADAR-MDD), which collected data every three months from patients with a history of recurrent MDD in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Spain (N = 619). We used latent class and latent transition analysis to identify subtypes at baseline, determined their consistency at 6- and 12-month follow-ups, and examined transitions over time. We identified a 4-class solution: (1) severe with appetite decrease, (2) severe with appetite increase, (3) moderate severity and (4) low severity. These same classes were identified at 6- and 12-month follow-ups, and participants tended to remain in the same class over time. We found no statistically significant differences between the two severe subtypes regarding baseline clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Our findings emphasize severity differences over symptom types, suggesting that current subtyping methods provide insights akin to existing severity measures. When examining transitions, participants were most likely to remain in their respective classes over 1-year, indicating chronicity rather than oscillations in depression severity. Future work recommendations are made.

Indexed as

DepressionMajor Depressive DisorderAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSelf ReportSeverity of Illness IndexSpainUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID39808668
PMCPMC11731715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.