ArticleThe Journal of craniofacial surgery2024
Sewing: A New Quilting Suture Method for Nasal Septum Repair.
Article in The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wide exposure VS. stab surgical incisions in necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck: a retrospective analysis of 22 cases.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A deviated nasal septum leads to congestion and headaches. Surgery is the primary treatment, requiring careful postoperative septum positioning to prevent bleeding and hematoma. The study compared this method with nasal packing and traditional nasal septum suturing regarding surgical time, patient pain, nasal obstruction, and bleeding after septoplasty. The surgical time for nasal packing was significantly shorter than that for the other 2 suturing methods (P < 0.0001), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two suture methods (P = 0.1358). The Visual Analog Scale scores showed that the pain in the packing group was significantly higher than that in the other 2 groups within 2 days after surgery (P < 0.0001). The pain during suture removal was significantly higher in the packing group than in the "sewing group" (P < 0.0001). The number of injuries to the outer wall of the nasal cavity by continuous suturing was significantly higher than that by sewing (P < 0.0001). Tearing within 2 days after surgery was significantly higher in the packing group than in the other 2 groups (P < 0.0001). Compared with nasal packing, nasal septum suturing can significantly reduce postoperative pain and tearing, improve comfort, and do not increase bleeding. The newly described nasal septum sewing method in this study has no difference in surgical time compared with the traditional suturing method and can reduce injuries to the outer wall of the nasal cavity. In addition, it is painless and easy to remove during suture removal.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.