Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39808526›Full record

Trial reportCornea2026

Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study: Methods and Impact on the Use of Corneas From Donors With Diabetes for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Marianne O Price, Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn, Colleen E Bauza, Zachariah W Reed, Beth Ann Benetz, Mark A Greiner, David D Verdier, Mark C Soper, Michael S Titus, Vincent M Monnier and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cornea, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05134480 (Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05134480 nacompletednot on this map

Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study (DEKS): Impact of Diabetes on Corneal Transplant Success and Endothelial Cell Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorCase Western Reserve UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled1,097ConditionsCorneal Endothelial Decompensation, Fuchs' Endothelial DystrophyArmsDescemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Marianne O PriceCornea Research Foundation of America, Indianapolis, IN.ORCID 0000-0002-6652-534
Loretta B Szczotka-FlynnDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Eye Institute, Cleveland, OH.
Colleen E BauzaJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-7569-2051
Zachariah W ReedJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL.
Beth Ann BenetzDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Eye Institute, Cleveland, OH.
Mark A GreinerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
David D VerdierVerdier Eye Center, Grand Rapids, MI.
Mark C SoperVisionFirst, Indianapolis, IN.
Michael S TitusEversight, Ann Arbor, MI.
Vincent M MonnierDepartment of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; and.
Baha M ArafahDepartment of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
Craig KollmanJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL.
Roy W BeckJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL.
Jonathan H LassDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Eye Institute, Cleveland, OH.
Writing Committee for the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study Group

Funding

Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study: Impact of Diabetes on Corneal Transplant Success and Cell LossUG1EY030030 · NEI · JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · PI Robin L Gal · 2021 to 2026
$5.2M
Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study(DEKS): Impact of Diabetes on Corneal Transplant Success and Cell LossUG1EY030039 · NEI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LASS, JONATHAN H, SZCZOTKA-FLYNN, LORETTA B · 2021 to 2025
$4.0M
National Eye Institute, Eye Bank Association of America, The Cornea Society, Cleveland Eye Bank Foundation, Beauty of Sight: A Lions Eye Bank, CorneaGen, Eversight, Eye Bank for Sight Restoration, Eye Bank of Kentucky, Lions Gift of Sight, Iowa Lions Eye Bank, Lions Eye Bank of Wisconsin, Kenneth Maverick, MD, Mayo Clinic, San Antonio Eye Bank, San Diego Eye Bank, Utah Lions Eye Bank, VisionFirst, VisionGift EY030030 and EY030039National Eye Institute, Eye Bank Association of America, The Cornea Society, Cleveland Eye Bank Foundation, Beauty of Sight: A Lions Eye Bank, CorneaGen, Eversight, Eye Bank for Sight Restoration, Eye Bank of Kentucky, Lions Gift of Sight, Iowa Lions Eye Bank, Lions Eye Bank of Wisconsin, Kenneth Maverick, MD, Mayo Clinic, San Antonio Eye , San Diego Eye , Utah Lions Eye , VisionFirst, VisionGift EY030030 and EY030039NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY030030NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY030039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDescribe aims, methods, characteristics of donors, donor corneas and recipients, and potential impact of the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study (DEKS).

methodsThe DEKS is a randomized, clinical trial to assess graft success and endothelial cell density (ECD) 1 year after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using corneas from donors with versus without diabetes in a 1:2 minimization assignment. Diabetes severity in the donor is assessed by medical history, postmortem HbA1c, and donor skin advanced glycation end-products and oxidation markers. A central image analysis reading center assesses baseline donor, 1-month and 1-year postoperative ECD.

resultsThe DEKS used corneas from 1154 donors for 1421 DMEK procedures on 1097 participants (324 bilateral) at 28 clinical sites. Forty-eight tissue preparations failed (3%). Mean donor age was 65 years; mean eye bank-determined screening ECD was 2709 cells/mm 2 . Ultimately, 106 (9%) of 1154 donors without diabetes history were classified as diabetic based on postmortem HbA1c ≥6.5%, and 509 (36%) of 1421 donor lenticules were classified as coming from diabetic donors. Recipients were 58% female, 96% White, and 53% phakic. Study eyes were treated for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (96%), pseudophakic corneal edema (2%), and failed endothelial keratoplasty (2%). Mean recipient age was 70 years; 21% had diabetes history and 26 (2%) had central laboratory determined HbA1c ≥6.5% without diabetes history.

conclusionsThe DEKS will increase understanding of factors related to DMEK success while determining whether diabetes and/or diabetes severity in the donor and/or recipient adversely affects graft success and endothelial cell loss.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyDiabetes MellitusEndothelium, CornealTissue DonorsAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountEye BanksFemaleGlycated HemoglobinGraft SurvivalHumansMaleMiddle AgedVisual AcuityGlycated HemoglobincorneaDescemet membrane endothelial keratoplastydiabeteseye banking

Identifiers

PMID39808526
PMCPMC12238323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.