GuidelineJAMA2025
Screening for Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
Guideline in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The predictive value of immune inflammation indexes for the risk of fracture in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Quantitative sensory testing of pain in osteoporosis: a pilot randomized clinical trial with magnesium supplementation.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Trial
- A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of the synbiotic medical food, SBD111, for the clinical dietary management of bone loss in menopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Trial
- Remote Bone Health Service for Osteoporosis Screening in High-Risk Men: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2025Trial
- Emergency Department Encounters Preceding Hip Fracture in Older Adults: A Window for Future Risk Identification.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Prevalence of vertebral osteoporosis in Thai postmenopausal women under 70.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- In vivo mechanical assessment of cortical bone rigidity enhances fracture discrimination beyond DXA in postmenopausal women.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026Article
- Beyond the T-Score: A Narrative Clinical Review of Adult Endocrine Osteoporosis Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Explainable Plasma Proteomics-Based Machine Learning for Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Protein Biomarker Discovery in the UK Biobank.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
- Management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in rheumatic diseases.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2026Review
- Association of composite inflammatory indicators with osteoporosis and sarcopenia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: the mediating role of inflammation.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- AI-derived opportunistic screening using chest radiographs identifies age- and sex-associated bone mineral density patterns and supports earlier osteoporosis evaluation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Article
- A clinical decision support tool for accurate hip fracture prediction: A nationwide cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of targeted and population screening for osteoporosis in women: scoping review.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Article
- The Neurology of Menopause.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Integrative Transcriptomic and Network Analysis of Shared Osteo-Immune Regulatory Programs in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis and Osteosarcoma Within Central Mexican Cohorts.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Response to the Letter to the Editor, Commentary on "Incident subclinical vertebral fractures and health-related quality of life: JPOS cohort study".Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2026Article
- Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.Endocrine reviews · 2026Review
- Timeliness of antiresorptive consolidation after anabolic therapy for primary fracture prevention: A US cohort study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on byBeyond the2025
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Osteoporotic fractures are associated with psychological distress, subsequent fractures, loss of independence, reduced ability to perform activities of daily living, and death. Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures in adults 40 years or older with no known diagnosis of osteoporosis or history of fragility fracture. Population: Adults 40 years or older without known osteoporosis or history of fragility fractures. Evidence Assessment: The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in women 65 years or older has moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women younger than 65 years at increased risk has moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient and the balance of benefits and harms for screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in men cannot be determined. Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in women 65 years or older. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women younger than 65 years who are at increased risk for an osteoporotic fracture as estimated by clinical risk assessment. (B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in men. (I statement).
Indexed as
Identifiers
39808425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.