ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Predictive Optimization of Patient No-Show Management in Primary Healthcare Using Machine Learning.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative waiting time and no-show risk in day surgery: a large-scale cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine Learning in Primary Health Care: The Research Landscape.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- e-Health Strategy for Surgical Prioritization: A Methodology Based on Digital Twins and Reinforcement Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Reframing "No-Show": Patient-Reported Barriers for Missed Post-Hospital Discharge Primary Care Follow-Up Visits.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical QualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "no-show" problem in healthcare refers to the prevalent phenomenon where patients schedule appointments with healthcare providers but fail to attend them without prior cancellation or rescheduling. In addressing this issue, our study delves into a multivariate analysis over a five-year period involving 21,969 patients. Our study introduces a predictive model framework that offers a holistic approach to managing the no-show problem in healthcare, incorporating elements into the objective function that address not only the accurate prediction of no-shows but also the management of service capacity, overbooking, and idle resource allocation resulting from mispredictions. Our approach simplifies preprocessing and eliminates the need for expert judgment in variable selection, thereby enhancing the model's usability in routine healthcare operations. Our research revealed that key predictors of no-shows are consistent across various studies. We employed semi-automatic feature selection techniques, achieving results comparable to state-of-the-art approaches but with significantly reduced complexity in their selection. This method not only streamlines the feature selection process but also enhances the overall efficiency and scalability of our predictive models, making them more adaptable to diverse healthcare settings. This comprehensive strategy enables healthcare providers to optimize resource allocation and improve service delivery, making our findings relevant for healthcare systems globally facing similar challenges. Future work aims to expand the analysis by incorporating additional third-party data sources, such as weather and commuting activities, to explore the broader impacts of external factors on patient no-show behavior. To the best of our knowledge, this innovative approach is expected to provide deeper insights and further enhance the predictability and effectiveness of no-show mitigation strategies in healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39808378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.