ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Comparison of opportunities and perceptions towards neurosurgery between the public and private sector in Pakistan: a national survey of medical students and recent graduates.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Early Exposure and Educational Gaps on Medical Students: A Career-Driven Strategy for Aspiring Neurosurgeons.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Advancing Surgical and Medical Education: Insights and Lessons from Neurosurgery in Pakistan.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Public and private medical institutes must adhere to the same standards of quality set by the Pakistan Medical & Dental Council (PMDC). However, studies have noted varied learning environments. The current study aims to assess opportunities and compare the differences in perceptions between the two sectors. An online survey was conducted among medical students, interns, and medical officers across Pakistan. Respondents were divided into two groups: private and public sector and the survey responses of the two groups were compared. Descriptive statistical analyses of responses were performed, and a chi-square test was used to obtain the p-values. 2,481 responses were collected (48.6% public vs 51.3% private sector). A higher proportion of public sector respondents reported neurosurgery within their curriculum (71.2% public, 58.9% private) ( p < 0.001), while a greater proportion of private sector respondents had less exposure to neurosurgery clerkships (58.5% public, 71.9% private). A higher proportion from the private sector reported that sufficient mentorship opportunities (38.3% private, 29.5% public) (p < 0.001) were provided by their medical college. More private sector respondents reported lack of work-life balance (39.5% public, 42.4% private), competitive work environment (55.9% public, 61.3% private) (p < 0.001) and financial burden (67.3% private, 60.8% public) (p < 0.001) as major barriers towards pursuing neurosurgery. Our study outlines key areas for improvement from the perspective of the learners themselves. These include increasing exposure to neurosurgery in medical colleges and affiliated hospitals and improving post-graduate training among all sectors. Addressing these concerns of the medical students, interns, recent graduates and medical officers can foster the pursuit of neurosurgery as a career in Pakistan. It is crucial to further investigate medical education in Pakistan and study differences in the public and private education sector globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39808338What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.